2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/878132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Artesunate-Amodiaquine versus Artemether-Lumefantrine in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in Sentinel Sites across Côte d’Ivoire

Abstract: Two years after the introduction of free Artesunate-Amodiaquine (ASAQ) and Artemether-Lumefantrine (AL) for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in public health facilities in Côte d'Ivoire, we carried out this study to compare their efficacy and tolerability in three surveillance sites. It was a multicentre open randomised clinical trial of 3-day ASAQ treatment against AL for the treatment of 2 parallel groups of patients aged 2 years and above. The endpoints were (1) Adequate Clinical and Parasitological R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by very high malaria transmission in the rural study site and the possible development of tolerance to ASAQ over time. The day 28 ACPR observed in this study is lower than that reported by several studies in sub‐Saharan Africa . However, the ACPR observed in this study needs to be interpreted with caution because this is not a clinical efficacy study of ASAQ, and it did not have strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, such as specific parasite density cut off or absence of any co‐morbidity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…This can be explained by very high malaria transmission in the rural study site and the possible development of tolerance to ASAQ over time. The day 28 ACPR observed in this study is lower than that reported by several studies in sub‐Saharan Africa . However, the ACPR observed in this study needs to be interpreted with caution because this is not a clinical efficacy study of ASAQ, and it did not have strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, such as specific parasite density cut off or absence of any co‐morbidity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Results from these studies demonstrated an estimated PCT of 48 hours for both AS + AQ and AL. 18 , 19 , 26 However, these estimations of PCT have some limitations. Determination of PCT based on daily sampling lacks precision since the exact time of parasite count is not recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,20,21 Studies in other parts of Africa have also shown cure rates greater than 90%. [22][23][24][25] There was no treatment failure observed during the first 2 weeks of followup. Late treatment failure occurred on days 21 and 28 in the two ecological zones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%