2020
DOI: 10.20524/aog.2020.0544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in non-malignant portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…74 In addition, meta-analyses and systematic reviews of observational studies of anticoagulation do not describe an increased risk of bleeding; in fact, several studies describe a possibly lower rate of portal hypertension-related bleeding. 75,76 However, no comparative efficacy data from RCTs exist to guide therapy in either the transplant or nontransplant populations. Given the lack of data on the clinical significance of nontumoral PVT and limited data about treatment outcomes, the benefit of routine screening for PVT remains uncertain and the Panel made a conditional recommendation against routine screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74 In addition, meta-analyses and systematic reviews of observational studies of anticoagulation do not describe an increased risk of bleeding; in fact, several studies describe a possibly lower rate of portal hypertension-related bleeding. 75,76 However, no comparative efficacy data from RCTs exist to guide therapy in either the transplant or nontransplant populations. Given the lack of data on the clinical significance of nontumoral PVT and limited data about treatment outcomes, the benefit of routine screening for PVT remains uncertain and the Panel made a conditional recommendation against routine screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 While trying to minimize bleeding risk, treatment with lowmolecular-weight heparin or vitamin K antagonists is generally recommended for patients with cirrhosis, 7,9 as this reduces the risk of thromboembolic events (eg, splanchnic and portal vein thrombosis or NVAF) and improves overall outcome. 10,11 DOACs such as apixaban and rivaroxaban are increasingly used as alternative safe and effective treatment options in stable patients, but their role in more advanced liver disease is unclear. 5,7,9 The use of DOACs introduces another level of complexity to coagulation testing in patients with cirrhosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anticoagulant therapy may be safely used in patients with cirrhosis and PVT as either no bleeding complications or only minor bleeding events have been reported [46,61]. Remarkably, two recent meta-analysis have shown a decreased incidence of variceal bleeding in patients under anticoagulation therapy compared to those without [46,62]. However, a platelet count below 50 × 10 9 /L has been identified as a risk factor for bleeding from any site in patients with cirrhosis and PVT receiving anticoagulation [60].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%