2019
DOI: 10.4143/crt.2018.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib for EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Compared with Gefitinib or Erlotinib

Abstract: First-line afatinib showed satisfactory efficacy data and manageable toxicity profiles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

13
83
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
13
83
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim et al revealed that in a subgroup of patients with 19del mutations, the median PFS of afatinib was significantly superior to gefitinib or erlotinib (19.1 vs. 15.0 and 16.3 months, respectively; P = 0.01). However, there was no such significant difference in the L858R subgroup ( P = 0.46) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Kim et al revealed that in a subgroup of patients with 19del mutations, the median PFS of afatinib was significantly superior to gefitinib or erlotinib (19.1 vs. 15.0 and 16.3 months, respectively; P = 0.01). However, there was no such significant difference in the L858R subgroup ( P = 0.46) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These outcomes may lead to a tendency in clinical practice to prescribe afatinib to patients with 19del mutations. Several real‐world studies have also demonstrated this tendency and reported longer median PFS in common EGFR mutation groups . Kim et al revealed that in a subgroup of patients with 19del mutations, the median PFS of afatinib was significantly superior to gefitinib or erlotinib (19.1 vs. 15.0 and 16.3 months, respectively; P = 0.01).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Erlotinib-treated patients of European origin with EGFR-positive adenocarcinoma showed increased PFS (9.7 vs. 5.2 months) compared to the chemotherapy-treated group in the EURTAC trial (14). In a face-to-face comparison of three TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib), afatinib showed the highest efficacy in terms of PFS duration (14 vs. 13.7 vs. 19.1 months, respectively) (15). Erlotinib is also used as a second-line or further treatment in patients with SCC due to more favorable toxicity profile compared to conventional chemotherapy (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%