2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.103953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have investigated the potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. A recent meta-analysis found no benefit in unselected patients, despite the additional burden of toxicity [4]. The most recent randomized trial, OUTBACK, found no benefit in OS or DFS [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have investigated the potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. A recent meta-analysis found no benefit in unselected patients, despite the additional burden of toxicity [4]. The most recent randomized trial, OUTBACK, found no benefit in OS or DFS [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the outcome in women with extensive nodal disease is poor [3], alternative treatments have been suggested. Adjuvant chemotherapy so far has not improved outcomes in unselected patients [4]. An alternative treatment strategy is neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by CRT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this choice is that predictive models, in LACC patients, seem useful only before and not after CRT. In fact, attempts to improve outcomes with treatments following CRT (e.g., adjuvant systemic treatments) were not successful, as demonstrated by very recent publications [ 38 , 39 ]. However, it should be noted that some studies showed a significant prognostic impact of post-treatment inflammatory indices or pre–post-treatment changes, even without significant correlations with pre-treatment values [ 19 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the primary clinical interest resides in pretreatment IIs values due to their potential to guide personalized treatment adjustments. Conversely, after CRT and BRT, there is no evidence to support additional treatments, particularly CHT, to improve clinical outcomes [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%