2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of the combination of etravirine plus raltegravir as novel dual antiretroviral maintenance regimen in HIV-infected patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a prospective study conducted in Barcelona, Spain, the criteria for efficacy was a viral load <50 copies/mL, achieved by 84% of 25 patients at 48 weeks [74]. This finding was corroborated by a prospective observational study in Madrid, Spain, in which 96% of 25 patients were still virologically suppressed 48 weeks after switching to ETR/RAL dual therapy [77]. At the University of Bologna, Italy, a prospective study with 38 patients used a tighter viral load criteria of <20 copies/mL, and 81.6% of patients achieved this outcome at 48 weeks [73].…”
Section: Etr/ralmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a prospective study conducted in Barcelona, Spain, the criteria for efficacy was a viral load <50 copies/mL, achieved by 84% of 25 patients at 48 weeks [74]. This finding was corroborated by a prospective observational study in Madrid, Spain, in which 96% of 25 patients were still virologically suppressed 48 weeks after switching to ETR/RAL dual therapy [77]. At the University of Bologna, Italy, a prospective study with 38 patients used a tighter viral load criteria of <20 copies/mL, and 81.6% of patients achieved this outcome at 48 weeks [73].…”
Section: Etr/ralmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…All of the patients switching off of EFV regimens saw neuropsychiatric improvements [74]. In another prospective study, 25 virologically suppressed cARTs patients who switched to ETR/RAL dual therapy saw significant drops from baseline in total cholesterol (−17 mg/dL, p = 0.01) and triglycerides (−42 mg/dL, p = 0.01) at week 48 [77]. An observational study with 38 virologically suppressed cARTs patients switching to ETR/RAL reported significant declines at week 48 in the total cholesterol (−44.3 mg/dL), triglycerides (−81.2 mg/dL), and prevalence of tubular proteinuria (−30.2%).…”
Section: Etr and Ralmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First, we included only those patients who received RAL plus two nucleoside analogues, but in some cases the nucleoside backbone might be less effective due to previous failure and resistance. In such cases, and despite the lack of clinical trials, the combination of RAL with NNRTIs, including those that are not (rilpivirine) or are weak inducers of CYP450 isoenzimes (etravirine), could be an option [20,21]. Second, relapse or progression-free survival was not considered as secondary end points because the objectives of the study were to determine the efficacy and safety of RALbased cART.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, etravirine (ETR) plus raltegravir (RAL) were an alternative NRTI sparing option, even if burdened by a daily 4 pills regimen. 5,6…”
Section: Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%