2001
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and outcome of intensive care in pediatric oncologic patients

Abstract: Diagnosis of cancer does not exclude potential benefit from intensive care medicine in these children, although severe complications might affect the prognosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
50
0
30

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
12
50
0
30
Order By: Relevance
“…Published studies with analyses that establish a risk score for mortality are scarce and mainly are based on adult and pediatric patients without neutropenia in the setting of intensive care unit admissions, adults hospitalized in oncology units, and low mortality risk scores in an adult population. 11,13 To our knowledge, there are no publications to date concerning the analysis of mortalitybased scores in hospitalized pediatric patients with FN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Published studies with analyses that establish a risk score for mortality are scarce and mainly are based on adult and pediatric patients without neutropenia in the setting of intensive care unit admissions, adults hospitalized in oncology units, and low mortality risk scores in an adult population. 11,13 To our knowledge, there are no publications to date concerning the analysis of mortalitybased scores in hospitalized pediatric patients with FN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] However, the studies that intended to identify risk factors used different designs and definitions, hindering the development of a standardized risk profile. However, several authorities analyzed the performance of different mortality scores on adult patients with cancer, either with or without FN, who were admitted to intensive care units, [10][11][12] including the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, the Organ Dysfunction and Infection Score, and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score. Results varied according to the method employed.…”
Section: Methods Between March 2000 and July 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentre os poucos trabalhos publicados, na maioria das vezes, a amostra analisada é pequena, menor que 100 (Sivan et al, 1991;Heney et al, 1992;Veen et al, 1996;Butt et al, 1998;Keengwe et al, 1999;Heying et al, 2001;Abraham et al, 2002;Haase et al, 2003;Kutko et al, 2003;Meyer et al, 2005;Pound et al, 2008;Dursun et al, 2009). Há apenas alguns estudos, incluindo dissertações que analisaram amostras maiores, que oscilaram entre 150 a 400 sujeitos (Hallahan et al, 2000;Dalton et al, 2003;Escobar et al, 2004;Fiser et al, 2005;Da Silva et al, 2008;Tamburro et al, 2008;Pancera et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…São inúmeras as causas que podem levar o paciente oncológico pediátrico a necessitar de suporte em uma UTIP, desde aquelas relacionadas ao tumor, até à intensidade da terapia anti-neoplásica, que, por si, pode levar a complicações graves e fatais (Keengwe et al, 1999;Gutierrez e de Camargo, 2001;Heying et al, 2001;Haase et al, 2003).…”
Section: 2unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation