2021
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toab094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Nontarget Effects of Net Exclusion Enclosures on Apple Pest Management

Abstract: Management of direct apple pests, such as codling moth, continues to be problematic despite the widespread implementation of behavioral and chemical controls. Apple growers have increased their use of netting to protect fruit from environmental injury, with some structures enclosing the entire orchard. These enclosures represent a new pest management tactic through physical exclusion. We conducted a two-year trial to examine the effects of full exclusion netting on pests and natural enemies of apples. Insect d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hail netting has gained popularity in pome fruit orchards worldwide to exclude and protect against insect pests ( 17 19 ). Over the last 20 years, the suppression effect of exclusion netting used in pear and apple orchards for codling moth and brown marmorated stink bug ( Halyomorpha halys ) has been well documented in French and Italian orchards ( 20 , 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hail netting has gained popularity in pome fruit orchards worldwide to exclude and protect against insect pests ( 17 19 ). Over the last 20 years, the suppression effect of exclusion netting used in pear and apple orchards for codling moth and brown marmorated stink bug ( Halyomorpha halys ) has been well documented in French and Italian orchards ( 20 , 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Quebec, Canada, a 5-year study documented the effectiveness of a single row, complete exclusion netting system that prevented damage from the apple maggot, codling moth, and the tarnished plant bug ( Lygus lineolaris ) ( 27 , 28 ). A study in Washington found that codling moth could be excluded by using net cages placed around large orchard blocks ( 19 , 29 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a cosmopolitan species and has been a major pest of pome fruit in North America for over two and a half centuries (Barnes, 1991;Slingerland, 1898). The economically important life stage is the larva as it penetrates the skin and feeds towards the centre of the fruit, and if left untreated can cause over 50% fruit loss in an orchard (Beers et al, 1993;Marshall & Beers, 2021). Insecticides have remained the dominant tool to control codling moth and continual use of various classes of chemicals have made resistance management and natural enemy conservation the primary focus of current codling moth management (Beers et al, 2016a(Beers et al, , 2016b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full block enclosures are being used in certain growing regions due to the benefits of keeping the orchard equipment accessible, and reducing wind, sunburn and heat stress (Castellano et al, 2008;Manja & Aoun, 2019). Previous studies in Washington (Marshall & Beers, 2021) found that full enclosures could reduce, but not eliminate codling moth damage, even though combined with insecticides. The cages in that study enclosed mature, infested trees, so that net permeability (to immigrating moths) was confounded by a pre-existing, reproducing population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Netting systems are widely used to protect crops against frugivorous bats and birds, hail, wind, frost, and sunburn (Lloyd et al 2005). Their efficiency has driven the global expansion of their use against a broad range of insect pests of horticultural and fruit crops, including Lepidoptera, Diptera, and Hemiptera (Chouinard et al 2017;Marshall and Beers 2016), among which Rhagoletis cerasi (Brand et al 2013) and psyllas (Romet et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%