2001
DOI: 10.4314/acsj.v9i1.27645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and economics of fungicide spray in the control of late blight of potato in Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the treatments showed significantly better foliage controlled as well as tuber yield over non-treated control. The results of this study were consistent with previous studies and indicated that the application of protective fungicides could reduce foliar late blight to acceptable levels [7,13,14]. The experiment conducted by Dhanbir et al [15] also similar to the present findings who concluded that all of the treatments reduced the disease but 8% metalaxyl + 64% mancozed ( as Ridomil MZ 72WP) was the most effective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…All the treatments showed significantly better foliage controlled as well as tuber yield over non-treated control. The results of this study were consistent with previous studies and indicated that the application of protective fungicides could reduce foliar late blight to acceptable levels [7,13,14]. The experiment conducted by Dhanbir et al [15] also similar to the present findings who concluded that all of the treatments reduced the disease but 8% metalaxyl + 64% mancozed ( as Ridomil MZ 72WP) was the most effective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The results of this study were consistent with previous studies and indicated that the application of protective fungicides could reduce foliar late blight to acceptable levels (Clayton and Shattock, 1995;Fontem, 2001; Kassa and Buyene, 2001; Kirk et al, 2001;Ojiambo et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Partial budgeting using marginal rate of return is simple to determine profitability of new technology or combination of practices using additional costs and returns which could be easily understood by farmers (CIMMYT, 1998). The method has been used by several scientists including Kassa andBayene (2001), Carroll et al (2009), and Kumar et al (2015).…”
Section: Cost Benefit Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%