2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00136.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of a high‐powered parallel waterjet for wound debridement

Abstract: Current concepts of wound healing acknowledge the essential role of wound bed preparation in achieving a wound with good healing potential. Critical to wound bed preparation is the removal of necrosis, unhealthy tissue, foreign matter, and infection. One of the accepted methods of wound bed preparation is surgery. The high-power parallel waterjet is a new surgical device, which allows the operator to remove very precisely undesirable tissue and debris with maximal preservation of viable tissue. A retrospective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 Forty-five patients treated between 2002 and 2003 were included and compared with patients who had comparable wounds but had been treated prior to acquisition of the VERSAJET s . The number of debridement procedures required to obtain a healthy wound was reduced from 1.9 to 1.2 per wound (P < 0.005) and there were no postoperative complications in the VERSAJET s group compared with four in the control group.…”
Section: Cost Of Debridementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Forty-five patients treated between 2002 and 2003 were included and compared with patients who had comparable wounds but had been treated prior to acquisition of the VERSAJET s . The number of debridement procedures required to obtain a healthy wound was reduced from 1.9 to 1.2 per wound (P < 0.005) and there were no postoperative complications in the VERSAJET s group compared with four in the control group.…”
Section: Cost Of Debridementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its cost effectiveness is debated, but reductions in operating time compared with conventional surgical débridement suggest potential cost savings with its use. 22,23 When sharp débridement is not an option, conservative management with enzymatic débride-ment has proven effective in removing slough and eschar. Collagenase (Santyl; Smith and Nephew, Inc., Largo, Fla.) shows more rapid removal of necrotic tissue over placebo, [24][25][26] and was shown to be superior to silver sulfadiazine in partialthickness burn wounds.…”
Section: Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some believe that the eschar acts as a protective barrier for the wound [39], while others believe that necrotic heel ulcers should be debrided with caution [40]. Hydrotherapy, which simultaneously cuts and aspirates soft tissue, is a form of surgical debridement that is said to be quicker yet cause minimal damage to tissues [41][42][43].…”
Section: Wound Management: Debridement and Cleansingmentioning
confidence: 99%