2019
DOI: 10.5539/ijb.v11n4p80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy, Adherence and Side Effects of PrEP for HIV-1 Prevention

Abstract: Each year, approximately two million new HIV infections are reported worldwide. About one decade ago, a company called Gilead Sciences Inc. discovered a new HIV prevention method named as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). When high adherence was kept among high-risk population, PrEP efficacy could reach as high as 99%. However, the adverse effects have been reported from time to time, including low efficacy in certain cases, adherence difficulties and medicinal side effects. In this review, we would summarize t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of PrEP for HIV prevention has been demonstrated in several studies including iPrEx (Pre-Exposure Initiative), the Partners PrEP study, the Bangkok Tenofovir study, Strand study, among others [7][8][9][10]. Protection levels varied from 44% -99% depending on the study and levels of adherence achieved [11]. Based on this, PrEP was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for persons at substantial risk of HIV acquisition of which FSW fit the characterization [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of PrEP for HIV prevention has been demonstrated in several studies including iPrEx (Pre-Exposure Initiative), the Partners PrEP study, the Bangkok Tenofovir study, Strand study, among others [7][8][9][10]. Protection levels varied from 44% -99% depending on the study and levels of adherence achieved [11]. Based on this, PrEP was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for persons at substantial risk of HIV acquisition of which FSW fit the characterization [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 In African women, clinical trials evaluating daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) for pre-exposure prophylaxis demonstrated inconsistent results, most likely owing to varying adherence levels. 5 While an effective vaccine remains a major challenge, new HIV prevention strategies are urgently required. 6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insights from universal testing and treatment trials demonstrate that early treatment alone is not sufficient to reduce the number of new infections and achieve epidemic control, but that effective HIV prevention methods are also needed 4. In African women, clinical trials evaluating daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) for pre-exposure prophylaxis demonstrated inconsistent results, most likely owing to varying adherence levels 5. While an effective vaccine remains a major challenge, new HIV prevention strategies are urgently required 6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%