1953
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(53)90124-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effets atmospheriques sur les gerbes d'Auger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean pressure coefficient was calculated to -0.710 ± 0.005 % /hPa . Which expectedly comes very similar for all the detectors with 0.11 rms.The measurements show fairly good agreement with previous reports [6,7]. After correcting for atmospheric effects, the reduction in daily variations can be seen easily in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean pressure coefficient was calculated to -0.710 ± 0.005 % /hPa . Which expectedly comes very similar for all the detectors with 0.11 rms.The measurements show fairly good agreement with previous reports [6,7]. After correcting for atmospheric effects, the reduction in daily variations can be seen easily in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Many studies were carried out to find the pressure coefficient of extensive air showers (EAS). Daudin [7] shows the pressure coefficient value is (-0.75±0.01)% /mb for EAS of primary energy ≈10 14 eV primary energies EAS. In section 3.2, we have studied the atmospheric pressure effect on GRAPES-3 EAS data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The mean pressure coefficients were calculated for all scintillation detectors which is found to be (-0.68 ± 0.01) % hPa −1 with 0.1 % hPa −1 rms as shown in Fig. 2, very similar to the earlier reports [7,8]. However, there is no lag observed between PD and pressure which is expected because pressure effect is independent of detector properties and therefore, all the detectors pressure coefficients are observed to be very similar which is reflected by narrow spread in coefficients.…”
Section: Pressure Effect On Particle Densitysupporting
confidence: 86%