1967
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4073(67)90042-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effet d'un champ magnetique uniforme sur les profils des raies de l'hydrogene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the unified theory it is possible to combine the collision broadening by electrons with the Stark splitting (statistical theory) caused by the ions. In the Schrödinger equation the electron contribution is described with a collision operator [17] and the ion contribution via an interaction Hamiltonian H = e r · E (linear Stark effect). For the electric field strengths produced by the ions we used the Mozer-Baranger distribution function [18,19], which is based on the Holtsmark distribution function [20] and additionally accounts for Debye shielding and ion-ion interactions.…”
Section: Theory Of Stark Broadening In a Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the unified theory it is possible to combine the collision broadening by electrons with the Stark splitting (statistical theory) caused by the ions. In the Schrödinger equation the electron contribution is described with a collision operator [17] and the ion contribution via an interaction Hamiltonian H = e r · E (linear Stark effect). For the electric field strengths produced by the ions we used the Mozer-Baranger distribution function [18,19], which is based on the Holtsmark distribution function [20] and additionally accounts for Debye shielding and ion-ion interactions.…”
Section: Theory Of Stark Broadening In a Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the magnetic field was not frozen and pushed in front of the plasma. The contribution of the Zeeman effect can be estimated from the parameter T defined in [l] and [2], which gives the contribution of the Stark effect over the Zeeman effect. In all cases the Zeeman effect was found negligible and consequently, it cannot be responsible for the detected red-shift of the emitted lines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) come from l = 2 viz., the electric quadrupole interactions, provided I ¿ 1 and J ¿ 1 for the nuclear and atomic spins, as otherwise the respective quadrupole moments proportional to Q 2 (nuc) = I; I |Q 2; 0 (nuc)| I; I and Q 2 (atom) = J; J |Q 2; 0 (atom)| J; J vanish, due to the vanishing of the Clebsch-Gordan coe cients in Eqs. (10) and (11) in such a case. Since Q 2 (nuc)Q 2 (atom), we neglect the nuclear contribution and represent the l = 2 term in H int as a (2J + 1) × (2J + 1) matrix in atomic spin space with elements given by…”
Section: Interaction Of Atom With An Arbitrary External Electric ÿEldmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The recent work in the use of line polarization as a diagnostic of ambient electric ÿelds in solar atmospheric features can be found in [9]. A rigorous formulation of the quantum problem of the hydrogen atom exposed to electric as well as magnetic ÿelds was presented by Casini and Landi Degl' Innocenti [5], widely generalizing the earlier work of Nguyen-Hoe et al [10]. They gave expressions for the Stokes proÿles emitted by a line transition using an earlier formalism [11], based on the density matrix concept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%