1992
DOI: 10.1002/cne.903200207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efferent connections of the centromedian and parafascicular thalamic nuclei in the squirrel monkey: A light and electron microscopic study of the thalamostriatal projection in relation to striatal heterogeneity

Abstract: The organization of the thalamostriatal projections arising from the centromedian (CM) and parafascicular (Pf) thalamic nuclei in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) was studied at both light and electron microscopic levels. Following selective injections of the anterograde axonal tracer Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) into the CM or Pf, patterns of terminal arborization within the striatum were compared to the biochemical heterogeneity of the striatum as revealed by immunohistochemical staining … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
174
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
11
174
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8). As expected based on previous studies (Sadikot et al, 1992;Smith et al, 1994), both injections produced large amount of anterograde labeling in fibers and axon terminals in the postcommissural putamen. In sections double-labeled for GluR6/7 or KA2 and BDA, 30 -60% of anterogradely labeled terminals (DAB-stained) displayed KAR subunit immunoreactivity (Table 3).…”
Section: Sources Of Immunoreactive Terminalssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8). As expected based on previous studies (Sadikot et al, 1992;Smith et al, 1994), both injections produced large amount of anterograde labeling in fibers and axon terminals in the postcommissural putamen. In sections double-labeled for GluR6/7 or KA2 and BDA, 30 -60% of anterogradely labeled terminals (DAB-stained) displayed KAR subunit immunoreactivity (Table 3).…”
Section: Sources Of Immunoreactive Terminalssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Because both cortical and thalamic afferents provide glutamatergic terminals forming asymmetric synapses in the monkey striatum (Sadikot et al, 1992;Smith et al, 1994), we tested whether KAR subunits were associated with both glutamatergic inputs. Injections of BDA were made in the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus or the primary motor cortex in two squirrel monkeys.…”
Section: Sources Of Immunoreactive Terminalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Thalamic projections terminate primarily onto dendrites, and are excitatory and also glutamatergic. 40,41 Cortico and thalamic inputs are distinguished by their transporter molecules and by their regulation of striatal circuitry. [42][43][44] Extracellular physiological recordings in awake, behaving monkeys show that the MSNs are phasically active neurons (PANs).…”
Section: Organizational Features Of the Striatummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant targets of corticostriatal and thalamostriatal projections are the dendritic spines of the medium-sized spiny neurons (MSNs), the main neuronal cell-type and principal projection neuron of the striatum (Kemp and Powell, 1971a,b;Somogyi et al, 1981;Dubé et al, 1988;Xu et al, 1989;Smith and Bolam, 1990;Xu et al, 1991;Sadikot et al, 1992;Smith et al, 1994Smith et al, , 2004Bolam et al, 2000;Lacey et al, 2005;Raju et al, 2006Raju et al, , 2008Moss and Bolam, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%