2022
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects on venous flow of transcutaneous electrical stimulation, neuromuscular stimulation, and sham stimulation on soleus muscle: A randomized crossover study in healthy subjects

Abstract: Background: Activation of venous flow has been shown with different types of electrical stimulation. The aim of this study is to compare the hemodynamic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), and sham stimulation on healthy young people.Methods: This randomized crossover study was conducted during June 2018 in the Faculty of Physical Therapy of A Coruña (Spain). Twenty-four university students (50% male) received in a randomized order 5 Hz-TE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our 'sham' (160 pps) TEAS was not completely without physiological effect, which may have biased our results. In retrospect, although various sham stimulation methods have been explored over the years by different researchers, some subthreshold and some suprathreshold [54][55][56], we should have amended our own experimental set-up to ensure no current whatsoever reached the participants. Unfortunately, we made a false assumption based on initial pilot experiments in which sham stimulation was, indeed, subthreshold for the test participants.…”
Section: Some Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our 'sham' (160 pps) TEAS was not completely without physiological effect, which may have biased our results. In retrospect, although various sham stimulation methods have been explored over the years by different researchers, some subthreshold and some suprathreshold [54][55][56], we should have amended our own experimental set-up to ensure no current whatsoever reached the participants. Unfortunately, we made a false assumption based on initial pilot experiments in which sham stimulation was, indeed, subthreshold for the test participants.…”
Section: Some Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%