Ergot Alkaloids and Related Compounds 1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-66775-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects on the Uterus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could explain the insensitivity to the second dose of 0.2 mg methylergometrine in postpartum uteri lasting 3 h, measured by external tocography as reported in 1959 [18] and observed in our experiments even 24 h after oral administration of 0.5 mg methylergometrine, Methylergometrine probably blocks a-receptors in the inner layer, specifically affecting the basal tone of this layer [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This could explain the insensitivity to the second dose of 0.2 mg methylergometrine in postpartum uteri lasting 3 h, measured by external tocography as reported in 1959 [18] and observed in our experiments even 24 h after oral administration of 0.5 mg methylergometrine, Methylergometrine probably blocks a-receptors in the inner layer, specifically affecting the basal tone of this layer [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…While extensive experimental and clinical experience supports the use of ergot alkaloids like methylergometrine for stimulation of myometrial activity in the early puerperium, the risk of uterine hypertonus has prevented the use of this drug in late pregnancy and labour (124).…”
Section: A D a Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl121mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we chose to induce contractions by the ergot alkaloid ergometrin which is known to be a powerful uterine stimulant (cf. Saameli,9). When comparing the resultant changes in frequency and amplitude after 3 h in the methylergometrine treated experiments versus the spontaneously contracting preparations, we were unable to detect any significant differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, experiments with the non-specific a-blocker phentolamine were added and these again did not show any significant changes. The experiment with phentolarnine seems to have special relevance in our study, since in a large number of preparations uterine activity was induced with ergornetrine, which is a partial alpha against (9). It therefore seems very unlikely that a-blockade is involved in the slight amplitude-reducing effect of labetalol, either in our in vitro experiments or in vivo, where a-blocking potency is lower than in vitro (14).…”
Section: Frequency (Contractions/h) and Amplitude (G) Of Human Utermentioning
confidence: 85%