“…However, chl a concentrations of epixylic biofilms in the present study were at the lower end of the range of values reported in former studies (e.g. Bowen et al, 1998;Dodds, 2003, Collier, 2004;Smokorowski et al, 2006), but direct comparisons between the studies were difficult. Beside the fact that different laboratory methods for analysis of chl a concentrations were used in the studies, the differences could be also explained by specific parameters of the sampling sites (lakes versus streams, fast versus slow flowing sites, dissolved nutrient concentrations and temperature, shading by canopy, grazing pressure by invertebrates) and the use of different wood substrates (small veneers, ice-cream sticks, dowels, wood blocks, natural branches), designs of incubation (depth of exposition, incubation in mesh bags, incubation near to the banks) and methods to remove biofilm from the wood surfaces (scraping, brushing, using whole wood piece).…”