2006
DOI: 10.1139/f06-104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects on periphyton and macroinvertebrates from removal of submerged wood in three Ontario lakes

Abstract: We removed 40%–70% of nearshore wood habitat from three lakes to test the link between habitat and productive capacity, specifically focusing on the provision of substrate for periphyton and invertebrate production by submerged wood. Our objectives were fourfold: (i) to calculate the total amount of invertebrate and periphyton biomass removed with the wood; (ii) to explore wood's value as habitat for invertebrates and periphyton; (iii) to determine the response within residual epixylic periphyton and invertebr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, chl a concentrations of epixylic biofilms in the present study were at the lower end of the range of values reported in former studies (e.g. Bowen et al, 1998;Dodds, 2003, Collier, 2004;Smokorowski et al, 2006), but direct comparisons between the studies were difficult. Beside the fact that different laboratory methods for analysis of chl a concentrations were used in the studies, the differences could be also explained by specific parameters of the sampling sites (lakes versus streams, fast versus slow flowing sites, dissolved nutrient concentrations and temperature, shading by canopy, grazing pressure by invertebrates) and the use of different wood substrates (small veneers, ice-cream sticks, dowels, wood blocks, natural branches), designs of incubation (depth of exposition, incubation in mesh bags, incubation near to the banks) and methods to remove biofilm from the wood surfaces (scraping, brushing, using whole wood piece).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…However, chl a concentrations of epixylic biofilms in the present study were at the lower end of the range of values reported in former studies (e.g. Bowen et al, 1998;Dodds, 2003, Collier, 2004;Smokorowski et al, 2006), but direct comparisons between the studies were difficult. Beside the fact that different laboratory methods for analysis of chl a concentrations were used in the studies, the differences could be also explained by specific parameters of the sampling sites (lakes versus streams, fast versus slow flowing sites, dissolved nutrient concentrations and temperature, shading by canopy, grazing pressure by invertebrates) and the use of different wood substrates (small veneers, ice-cream sticks, dowels, wood blocks, natural branches), designs of incubation (depth of exposition, incubation in mesh bags, incubation near to the banks) and methods to remove biofilm from the wood surfaces (scraping, brushing, using whole wood piece).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Smokorowski et al, 2006;Sass et al, 2006a, b;Schneider & Winemiller, 2008). Clusters of CWD obviously diversify the bottom topography and increase the heterogeneity of littoral zones.…”
Section: Effects Of Cwd On Habitat Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1E, F). Therefore, CWD in lakes can be assigned to different decay classes, as firm fresh wood, wood with loose or absent bark or wood with a clearly rotted surface (Smokorowski et al, 2006). The combination of various threedimensional shapes of CWD with different degrees of wood decay provides a mosaic of habitats and a variety of shelters for lake biota that can support diverse wood-associated communities (Newbrey et al, 2005;Smokorowski et al, 2006).…”
Section: Effects Of Cwd On Habitat Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations