2020
DOI: 10.1111/sum.12595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects on nitrate leaching of the timing of cattle slurry application to leys

Abstract: High nitrogen leaching from agricultural soil via drainage water causes eutrophication of surface waters and contamination of drinking water. High nitrate levels in soil in combination with high drainage runoff, especially from sandy soils, are associated with a high leaching risk. To minimize nitrogen leaching, nitrate levels in soil should therefore be limited during periods with high water throughflow in the soil profile. For example, animal slurry with high levels of ammonium that is readily converted to n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The timing of manure application can affect the losses of nutrients. For example, Delin and Stenberg (2020) found that spring application of cattle slurry resulted in lower subsurface leaching losses of NO 3 –N than autumn application. However, in a similar cropping system with undersown ley in spring barley, Turtola and Yli‐Halla (1999) observed higher PO 4 –P concentrations in surface runoff from experimental plots treated with mineral fertilizer and manure compared with unfertilized control plots.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing of manure application can affect the losses of nutrients. For example, Delin and Stenberg (2020) found that spring application of cattle slurry resulted in lower subsurface leaching losses of NO 3 –N than autumn application. However, in a similar cropping system with undersown ley in spring barley, Turtola and Yli‐Halla (1999) observed higher PO 4 –P concentrations in surface runoff from experimental plots treated with mineral fertilizer and manure compared with unfertilized control plots.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of ammonia removal in the set-up tested in this work can be related to the use of a second static mixer after hydroxide addition, ensuring a better mixing and a correct pH regulation. Although this entails no ammonia removal, it could be considered an advantage since ammonia is better than nitrite for nitrogen fertigation due to less leaching risk (Delin and Stenberg, 2020). With a convenient dose, nitrogen recycling could be achieved, contributing to production sustainability.…”
Section: Chemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost complete recovery of the nutrients and suspended organic matter was attained due to the improved settling features of the formed flocs. Hence, the use of an efficient settler to recover the solid formed by continuous coagulation-flocculation from the feedlot wastewaters would allow rapid treatment and eventual development of a solid fertilizer (Ciapparelli et al, 2016), while the clarified water may be used for fertigation (Delin and Stenberg, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They experimentally evidenced that the use of an efficient settler allows rapid treatment of the wastewater while recovering the nutrients to eventually produce a solid fertilizer and clarified water for fertigation. 8,9 Lamella settlers are quite convenient for large capacities, since they constitute high-rate, low-cost installations. Smaller units are required compared to conventional settlers or sedimentation basins.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%