Effects on lactating dairy cows of oscillating dietary concentrations of unsaturated and total long-chain fatty acids

Abstract

The nutrient composition of diets can vary from batch to batch because of variation in the nutrient composition of ingredients. The concentration of fat in distillers grains can be highly variable and, coupled with a high dietary inclusion rate, can result in substantial variation in the fat concentration of the total diet. Our hypothesis was that variation in dietary fat concentrations over short periods would have negative effects on production measures of dairy cattle. Twenty-four Holstein cows were used in 8 truncated Latin squares (3 cows × 2 periods). Periods were 16 d long, with a 12-d washout period separating the 2 periods. The 3 treatments were 1) control, 2) moderate variation, and 3) high variation. The control treatment was a consistent diet over the 16 d and contained 5.8% (dry basis) total long-chain fatty acids (LCFA), 23.7% distillers grains, and 1.1% of dry matter as corn oil. The average concentration of LCFA over the 16-d period for the moderate variation and high variation treatments was also 5.9%, but concentrations of LCFA varied over time by the addition or removal of corn oil. The moderate variation treatment had a 4-d phase of 5.4% LCFA, followed by a 4-d phase with 6.4% LCFA to complete the cycle, and then the cycle was repeated. The high variation treatment followed the same cycle pattern, but concentration of LCFA was either 4.8 or 7.0%. Over the 16 d, dry matter intake and milk yield were significantly decreased by the high variation treatment (intake = 21.7, 21.8, and 20.7 kg/d; milk = 36.4, 37.6, and 35.4 kg/d for the control, moderate variation, and high variation treatments). The effect of variation appeared to be cumulative; differences were not significant in the first 8-d cycle but were in the second 8-d cycle. Milk fat concentration was low (2.4%) and was not affected by treatment or cycle × treatment. The concentration of trans-10 C18:1 in milk fat was very high (4.2% of total milk fatty acids) but was not affected by treatment. However, cows on the high variation treatment had higher concentrations of trans-10, cis-12 C18:2 in milk fat (0.036, 0.042, and 0.047% of milk fatty acids for the control, moderate variation, and high variation treatments). Overall, an extreme short-term fluctuation in dietary fat concentration was needed before negative effects were observed.

Effects of short-term variation in forage quality and forage to concentrate ratio on lactating dairy cows

“…What is not known is the effect of short-term (i.e., daily) changes in diet FNDF and whether daily variation has cumulative effects on cows. Oscillating concentrations of dietary long-chain fatty acids reduced DMI and milk production but the response did not occur until cows were on treatment for about 8 d (Weiss et al, 2013). In contrast, oscillation of dietary CP had no negative short-term or cumulative negative effects on nutrient utilization or growth in beef cattle (Cole et al, 2003).…”

Effects of commercially available palmitic and stearic acid supplements on nutrient digestibility and production responses of lactating dairy cows

“…Characterization and FA profiles of the supplements are shown in Table 1. Truncated Latin square designs have been used previously in experiments in dairy science (Clark and Armentano, 1999;Weiss et al, 2013;de Souza et al, 2019a). For our truncated Latin square design with 3 × 2 treatments and periods, multiples of 12 cows were required to balance treatment sequences; therefore, each cow was assigned to 2 treatments in 2 different periods.…”

Altering the ratio of dietary C16:0 and cis-9 C18:1 interacts with production level in dairy cows: Effects on production responses and energy partitioning

“…The ingredient and nutrient compositions of the diets fed as TMR are described in Table 3. Truncated Latin square designs have been used previously in experiments in dairy science (e.g., Clark and Armentano, 1999;Weiss et al, 2013). For our truncated Latin square design with 4 × 2 treatments and periods, multiples of 12 cows per production group were required to completely balance treatment sequences within block; therefore, each cow was assigned to 2 treatments in 2 different periods.…”