2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2021.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of wing flexibility on aerodynamic performance of an aircraft model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, this project investigates a combination of two methods using an active folding of the wing and a passive adaptation of the wing surface, as in natural flyers, to enhance the flight envelope of small aircraft. The investigated morphing wing is part of a common research project with the Beihang University (He et al, 2019;Guo et al, 2021). Both project partners investigate morphing W/T models in their facilities.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, this project investigates a combination of two methods using an active folding of the wing and a passive adaptation of the wing surface, as in natural flyers, to enhance the flight envelope of small aircraft. The investigated morphing wing is part of a common research project with the Beihang University (He et al, 2019;Guo et al, 2021). Both project partners investigate morphing W/T models in their facilities.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first feature is the superior stall characteristics, because the shape of the airfoil passively adapts to the inflow at high angles of attack. Guo et al revealed a delayed stall and an increased lift for a W/T model with flexible membrane wings (Guo et al, 2021). Furthermore, small and lightweight vehicles like micro air vehicles are exposed to a turbulent flight environment, where flexible wing surfaces can reduce loads and improve the stability (Jenkins et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2020) and Guo et al. (2021) all found that the lift-enhancement effect of passive flexible wings became worse at high Re . The numerical simulations of Arif et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When α is small, the disordered vibration may be detrimental for the aerodynamics compared with rigid cambered wings (Serrano-Galiano et al 2018). For the complex wings with partially flexible surfaces, Açıkel & Genç (2018), Genç et al (2020) and Guo et al (2021) all found that the lift-enhancement effect of passive flexible wings became worse at high Re. The numerical simulations of Arif et al (2020) and Arif, Lam & Leung (2022) on the passive control of a NACA 0012 airfoil with localized elastic panels flush mounted on the suction surface also reported that the elastic panel configuration has no significant influence on airfoil aerodynamic performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research indicates that the membrane airfoil can automatically adjust the inflow by changing the radian to balance the pressure difference between the upper and lower regions, inhibit the air flow separation on the upper surface, and delay the stall of the airfoil. Guo et al [21] conducted wind tunnel experiments on a simplified aircraft model equipped with flexible membrane wings. The research indicates that under optimal conditions, the membrane wing achieves a stall delay of 5 • compared with the rigid wing, which is closely related to the flow coupling caused by membrane deformation and vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%