2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of winding angle on the behaviour of glass/epoxy pipes under multiaxial cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the investigation of Krishnan (2015), each winding angle dominates a different optimum pressure loading condition. Thus, the winding angle was chosen considering the actual loading condition of pipes.…”
Section: Parallel-plate Loading Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the investigation of Krishnan (2015), each winding angle dominates a different optimum pressure loading condition. Thus, the winding angle was chosen considering the actual loading condition of pipes.…”
Section: Parallel-plate Loading Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehmet and Ramazan (2012) examined the effect of seawater immersion on the impact behavior of FRP pipes. Krishnan et al (2015) investigated the effects of the winding angle on the behavior of FRP pipes under multiaxial cyclic loading. Rafiee and Amini (2015) carried out experimental and theoretical studies that predicted the functional failure pressure of FRP pipes subjected to hydrostatic internal pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This angle is commonly encountered since the netting analysis suggests that this is the optimum angle to use in piping systems where the ratio of applied hoop to axial stress is 2:1 [13]. The stress components induced in each ply have to be calculated when the pipe is subjected to internal pressure.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies were carried out in order to determine the influence of FW parameters on the mechanical behavior of structures. For instance, Krishnan et al [5] evaluated the influence of the winding angle in composite tubes subjected to multiaxial cyclic pressure loadings. Failure envelopes showed a strong dependence on stress ratio and winding angle, with [±45]4, tending to be axially dominant, and [±63]4 performing better under high hoop-dominant loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%