2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10798-018-9488-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of web-based versus classroom-based STEM learning environments on the development of collaborative problem-solving skills in junior high school students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, collaborative problem solving (CPS) is a promising area in STEM education because of its advantages in inculcating the understanding of scientific knowledge and others' ideas, training in scientific investigation, and solving applied problems (Hesse et al, 2015;Hogan, 1999;Lin et al, 2015). Lin, Yu, Hsiao, Chang, and Chien (2018) compared the effectiveness of web-based CPS system and the classroom-based hands-on activities including the CPS scenarios from daily life, in order to develop students' CPS skills in STEM learning. As their results, the virtual STEM learning environment was found to be more effective in the development of their CPS skills than traditional classroom-based hands-on activities, and the effectiveness of the system would be further enhanced with teacher' involvement and guidance (Lin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, collaborative problem solving (CPS) is a promising area in STEM education because of its advantages in inculcating the understanding of scientific knowledge and others' ideas, training in scientific investigation, and solving applied problems (Hesse et al, 2015;Hogan, 1999;Lin et al, 2015). Lin, Yu, Hsiao, Chang, and Chien (2018) compared the effectiveness of web-based CPS system and the classroom-based hands-on activities including the CPS scenarios from daily life, in order to develop students' CPS skills in STEM learning. As their results, the virtual STEM learning environment was found to be more effective in the development of their CPS skills than traditional classroom-based hands-on activities, and the effectiveness of the system would be further enhanced with teacher' involvement and guidance (Lin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin, Yu, Hsiao, Chang, and Chien (2018) compared the effectiveness of web-based CPS system and the classroom-based hands-on activities including the CPS scenarios from daily life, in order to develop students' CPS skills in STEM learning. As their results, the virtual STEM learning environment was found to be more effective in the development of their CPS skills than traditional classroom-based hands-on activities, and the effectiveness of the system would be further enhanced with teacher' involvement and guidance (Lin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Shanta and Wells (2020) found that technology-based learning and engineering design significantly affect students' problem-solving skills. In line with that, Priemer et al (2020) and Lin et al (2015Lin et al ( , 2020 explained that learning by integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics can improve student problemsolving. Another report shows that as a type of life skill, student problem-solving can improve in a project-based learning environment (Wurdinger & Qureshi, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In their study with Malaysian students, Nordin and Osman (2018) found that the module they used improved all CPS skills. Lin, Yu, Hsiao, Chang, and Chien (2018) conducted a semi-experimental study with Taiwanese students. In their study, the researchers tried to improve the CPS competencies of three groups of students who received STEM education with teacher-guided web-based applications in the first group, with only web-based applications in the second group and only in-class activities in the third group.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%