2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of water vapor on flue gas conditioning in the electric fields with corona discharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the background gas is air in the DBD plasma system, a large number of oxygen-containing active substances such as O 3 will also be produced in addition to the nitrogenous active substances, as shown in figure S3 [40][41][42]. The main pathway of O 3 generation in DBD plasma is shown in the reaction equations ( 12)-( 15) [40]. Among them, M is a molecule such as N 2 or O 2 in the background air.…”
Section: Effect Analysis Of Active Substancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the background gas is air in the DBD plasma system, a large number of oxygen-containing active substances such as O 3 will also be produced in addition to the nitrogenous active substances, as shown in figure S3 [40][41][42]. The main pathway of O 3 generation in DBD plasma is shown in the reaction equations ( 12)-( 15) [40]. Among them, M is a molecule such as N 2 or O 2 in the background air.…”
Section: Effect Analysis Of Active Substancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reduction of applied voltage and current will restrict the discharge and power injected, leading to poor performance in specific applications. Hence, periodic pulse corona discharge has been proposed to address this problem, as explored in the following content (Yan et al 2008a;Vandenbroucke et al 2011;Jiang and Zheng 1997;Lowke and Morrow 1995;Ogasawara et al 2015;Lee et al 2003a;Demidiouk and Chae 2005;Yao 2004;Fada et al 2015;Liqiang and Yajuan 2013).…”
Section: Principle Of Corona Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the removal efficiency of FP by traditional dedusting equipment is very low, especially for FP with a diameter of less than 1 μm (PM1.0) . In order to overcome the bottleneck effect of traditional technology in FP treatment, researchers try to use external field sources and matters such as electric field, acoustic field, magnetic field, temperature field, light source, chemical agglomeration solution, and water vapour for FP removal by coagulating and enlarging it first and then using conventional dust removal equipment. However, all of these technologies may be accompanied by relatively high investment costs and energy consumption, and some of these combined processes may cause secondary pollution and an increase in wastewater production …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all of these technologies may be accompanied by relatively high investment costs and energy consumption, [21] and some of these combined processes may cause secondary pollution and an increase in wastewater production. [18][19][20]22] For the comprehensive consideration of treatment cost and removal efficiency of FP, wet dedusting methods exhibit many advantages such as high FP removal efficiency, low treatment cost, and the wastewater and exhaust gas can be treated simultaneously, or simultaneous removal of SO 2 and FP. [23][24][25][26][27][28] However, in the conventional wet dedusting devices function via a gravity-driven approach, [23][24][25] the FP removal efficiency is limited by the collision probability between the liquid phase and fine particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%