2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scispo.2016.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of water-based endurance training, resistance training, and combined water and resistance training programs on visfatin and ICAM-1 levels in sedentary obese women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
67
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of intervention duration on the subgroup heterogeneity and intervention effect. To this end, studies with interventions lasting 8 weeks (64,67) and 52 weeks (56,59,60) were individually excluded from the subgroup analyses evaluating the effectiveness of AE‐V and AE‐M on improving BW, CRF, and %BF. Results found that the exclusion of trials with 8‐week or 52‐week interventions from the AE‐V and AE‐M subgroup analyses for BW, CRF, and %BF did not result in a significant reduction in heterogeneity or intervention effect (Supporting Information Figures S4‐S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of intervention duration on the subgroup heterogeneity and intervention effect. To this end, studies with interventions lasting 8 weeks (64,67) and 52 weeks (56,59,60) were individually excluded from the subgroup analyses evaluating the effectiveness of AE‐V and AE‐M on improving BW, CRF, and %BF. Results found that the exclusion of trials with 8‐week or 52‐week interventions from the AE‐V and AE‐M subgroup analyses for BW, CRF, and %BF did not result in a significant reduction in heterogeneity or intervention effect (Supporting Information Figures S4‐S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 129 were excluded as they did not fulfil our inclusion criteria. The remaining 45 studies were included in this review 13–15,17,21,38–77 . The detailed process is illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 1173 participants (female n = 919) were controls (no exercise). The mean length of exercise interventions was 20.3 weeks (SD = 13.4), ranging from 17,41,57–60,70,71 8 to 52 weeks, 50,51,54,56,64 with more than half (59%) of the studies reporting exercise interventions that lasted 12 weeks in duration. The number of weekly sessions and their length was reported in all 45 studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los factores perjudiciales mencionados anteriormente repercuten negativamente en el gasto cardiaco de los sujetos tanto en estado de reposo como durante la ejecución de la actividad, lo que influye en el tiempo de recuperación fisiológica, haciéndola de esta manera que la prolongación temporal sea mayor, (Jenkins, Evenson, Herring, Hales y Stevens, 2017;Varney-Shaw, Bebarta-Vikhyat, Vargas-Toni, Boudreau y Castaneda, 2014). Así mismo, el aumento de la presión arterial se ve afectado por la pérdida de elasticidad de los vasos sanguíneos, las cuales como consecuencia estimulan el estrechamiento de estos en la musculatura cardiaca, afectando a su vez al resto de órganos vitales y a la reducción del gasto cardiaco, mediante la disminución del VO2 máximo, lo que conlleva efectos negativos sobre la frecuencia cardiaca y el volumen sistólico (González-Valero, Zurita-Ortega, San Román-Mata, Pérez-Cortés, Puertas-Molero y Chacón-Cuberos, Soori et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified