Effects of wars and boycotts on international trade: Evidence from the late Ottoman Empire

Hanedar, Avni Önder

doi:10.1080/08853908.2015.1102107

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Results1

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this context, the ineffective nature of the trade agreements may have disturbed the explanatory role of trade agreements in bilateral trade flows. Also, our findings regarding railways and trade agreements are consistent with the previous literature, such as Hanedar (2016).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determinants of Bilateral Trade between Europeans and the Ottoman Empire: 1878-1913

Türel¹,

BAYCAR²

2022

WJAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the 19th century, the Ottoman Empire experienced an increased integration into the world economy, primarily through the development of bilateral trade with European markets. This study examines the determinants of bilateral trade of the Ottoman Empire with its trading partners between 1878 and 1913 using a panel regression framework. The results indicate that the GDP of trading partners, distance, common borders, and the adoption of the metric system significantly affected bilateral trade. In contrast, the GDP of the Ottoman Empire, trade agreements, railways, and commercial ports had no statistically significant effects on the mentioned trade relations.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

“…However, empirical research on the OE's bilateral trade remained very limited. Hanedar (2016) estimated the effect of wars and boycotts on bilateral trade using a gravity panel regression model between 1830-1913. His findings show a significant decrease in trade volume because of wars and boycotts during this period.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%