2018
DOI: 10.1080/00380768.2018.1467727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of warming and nitrogen addition on nutrient resorption efficiency in an alpine meadow on the northern Tibetan Plateau

Abstract: The increase in two controversial global environmental issues, climate warming and nitrogen (N) deposition, may have distinct effects on the processes and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. Nutrient resorption is an important determinant of plant community nutrient dynamics, especially in nutrient-limited ecosystems, but information about N and phosphorus (P) resorption in alpine ecosystems is still lacking. A long-term simulated warming and exogenous N addition experiment initiated in July 2010 was conduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed reductions in foliar N resorption are in line with studies reporting decreased N resorption efficiency with increasing mean annual temperatures in larger sets of species (Brant & Chen, ; Tang, Han, Chen, & Fang, ; Yuan & Chen, ; Zhang, Guo, Yu, Wang, & Wu, ). However, they are in contrast to previous findings that reported neutral or positive effects of simulated climate warming on nutrient resorption in plant species from temperate or cold climates (Aerts et al, ; Zong et al, ). This discrepancy may arise from the lower mean annual temperatures and lower temperature increases in these previous studies (a 0.93°C increase in Aerts et al, and a 2.2°C increase in Zong et al, ) compared with the 2–4°C increases in an already warmer climate simulated in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The observed reductions in foliar N resorption are in line with studies reporting decreased N resorption efficiency with increasing mean annual temperatures in larger sets of species (Brant & Chen, ; Tang, Han, Chen, & Fang, ; Yuan & Chen, ; Zhang, Guo, Yu, Wang, & Wu, ). However, they are in contrast to previous findings that reported neutral or positive effects of simulated climate warming on nutrient resorption in plant species from temperate or cold climates (Aerts et al, ; Zong et al, ). This discrepancy may arise from the lower mean annual temperatures and lower temperature increases in these previous studies (a 0.93°C increase in Aerts et al, and a 2.2°C increase in Zong et al, ) compared with the 2–4°C increases in an already warmer climate simulated in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are in contrast to previous findings that reported neutral or positive effects of simulated climate warming on nutrient resorption in plant species from temperate or cold climates (Aerts et al, ; Zong et al, ). This discrepancy may arise from the lower mean annual temperatures and lower temperature increases in these previous studies (a 0.93°C increase in Aerts et al, and a 2.2°C increase in Zong et al, ) compared with the 2–4°C increases in an already warmer climate simulated in this study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Effects of warming on N cycling are usually driven by the balance of plant N demand and underground N supply (Chang et al., 2017; Noyce et al., 2019). On the one hand, warming is found to enhance plant N demand, such as the increases in plant N uptake (DeMarco et al., 2014; Turner & Henry, 2009), plant N resorption (Zong et al., 2018) and root capture for N (Leppälammi‐Kujansuu et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2017). On the other hand, warming can enhance underground N supply via accelerating N mineralization (Bai et al., 2013; Butler et al., 2012; Dawes et al., 2017; Gao & Yan, 2019), microbial N fixation (Sorensen & Michelsen, 2011) and increasing mycorrhizal contribution (Olsrud et al., 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%