2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
2
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining 6 studies were basic research studies with histological assessment as the reference standard (Table 1). Three were undertaken on extracted teeth, [34][35][36] 2 on dry mandibles, 37,38 and 1 on cadavers. 39 Regarding outcomes, the mean difference was calculated in 3 studies, whereas the mean absolute difference was calculated in the other 3 studies (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 6 studies were basic research studies with histological assessment as the reference standard (Table 1). Three were undertaken on extracted teeth, [34][35][36] 2 on dry mandibles, 37,38 and 1 on cadavers. 39 Regarding outcomes, the mean difference was calculated in 3 studies, whereas the mean absolute difference was calculated in the other 3 studies (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inspection of the third dimension of the root canal helps to increase the accuracy of working length estimation. Therefore, measurements of root canals on existing CBCT images are a relatively new method for the con rmation of the diagnostic working length, which has been studied by numerous researchers [22,23]. However, the CBCT scan not recommended to be used routinely in endodontic practice because of dose considerations and potential radiation risks [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional 2-dimensional (2D) radiographs provide a cost-effective, high-resolution image, which continues to be the most popular method of imaging today. However, intraoral radiography has some limitations because of its 2-dimensional nature, information may be di cult to interpret, especially in challenging conditions when the anatomy and background pattern are complex [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…El uso de Cone Beam (CBCT) da la posibilidad de determinar LT de manera preoperatoria para obtener información anatómica de manera confiable en formato 3D (Aktan et al, 2016;Janner et al, 2011;Liang et al, 2013). A pesar de la gran ventaja que ofrece el CBCT para la endodoncia, hasta hoy no existe un consenso en la literatura sobre la precisión de medir LT con este sistema, en comparación con LEF y/o con método radiográfico (Método de Ingle) (Liang et al;Sherrard et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified