Interspeech 2008 2008
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2008-195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of vocal effort and speaking style on text-independent speaker verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with results showing that rich multi-modal information results in better representations of affective categories 48 . Similar evidence also exists from automatic voice recognition, demonstrating that training data from speakers under a variety of speech registers increases correct recognition probability of test data containing high variability 18 . This means that maximizing knowledge about within-voice variability supports the receivers' ability to identify a voice under a wide variety of registers and generalizes to previously unexperienced realizations of particular registers by a speaker.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in line with results showing that rich multi-modal information results in better representations of affective categories 48 . Similar evidence also exists from automatic voice recognition, demonstrating that training data from speakers under a variety of speech registers increases correct recognition probability of test data containing high variability 18 . This means that maximizing knowledge about within-voice variability supports the receivers' ability to identify a voice under a wide variety of registers and generalizes to previously unexperienced realizations of particular registers by a speaker.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Other than a mere shift between ADS and IDS -as argued by Piazza et al 4 -this means that the potential vocal space a speaker occupies is better represented in IDS compared to ADS registers, and further, that IDS includes the timbre space of ADS significantly more than the other way around. We thus obtained a rigorous acoustic model that explains the variability advantage demonstrated in prior studies in both computer 19 and human 38 voice recognition. This preprint research paper has not been peer reviewed.…”
Section: Acoustic Modelling: Ads Is a Timbre Subspace Of Idsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, such singer recognition systems can be less generalized to various singing styles and pronunciation effects. The voice of the a cappella solo singing is a speaking style that clearly demonstrates the singer's multiple features [9]. There are significant differences between the spoken language and a cappella solo of the same speaker.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%