2014
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of virus on plant fecundity and population dynamics

Abstract: SummaryMicroorganisms are ubiquitous and thought to regulate host populations. Although microorganisms can be pathogenic and affect components of fitness, few studies have examined their effects on wild plant populations. As individual traits might not contribute equally to changes in population growth rate, it is essential to examine the entire life cycle to determine how microorganisms affect host population dynamics.In this study, we used data from common garden experiments with plants from three Cucurbita … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the most probable explanation of our observed low incidences of mixed infections may be inefficient vector transmission of viruses between the wild plants or between cultivated and wild plants [31] and/or high levels of virus resistance in wild species preventing infection or keeping virus titers at undetectable levels [12, 82]. Furthermore, synergistic or additive effects of multiple virus infections causing severe disease could have eliminated co-infected plants [12, 5, 8386]. These effects can vary among populations [12, 87, 88], species [89] and environments [75, 90, 91].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the most probable explanation of our observed low incidences of mixed infections may be inefficient vector transmission of viruses between the wild plants or between cultivated and wild plants [31] and/or high levels of virus resistance in wild species preventing infection or keeping virus titers at undetectable levels [12, 82]. Furthermore, synergistic or additive effects of multiple virus infections causing severe disease could have eliminated co-infected plants [12, 5, 8386]. These effects can vary among populations [12, 87, 88], species [89] and environments [75, 90, 91].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CMV, infection reduced the population growth rate of two populations and had no effect on the third. In an experimental study, fruit and seed production were not altered by either virus, indicating that more complex factors are involved in the role of viruses in natural population growth rates, including the possible selection of tolerant genotypes (Prendeville et al, 2014).…”
Section: Viruses In Wild Plant Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants are frequently attacked by pathogens in natural populations with successful infection leading to variable levels of disease prevalence and severity in host populations. Given that the negative fitness consequences of becoming infected are a central assumption in disease evolutionary theory (Jayakar 1970;Frank 1992;Brown & Tellier 2011), surprisingly few studies (Alexander & Antonovics 1988;Fowler & Clay 1995;Malmstrom et al 2005;Prendeville, Tenhumberg & Pilson 2014) have examined how pathogens influence fecundity and demography of their host species, particularly over long periods of time and under varying epidemic conditions. The negative fitness consequences of pathogen infection are hypothesized to result in profound changes at both host population (Jayakar 1970) and community (Connell 1970;Janzen 1970) levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%