Effects of Virtual Reality Education on Procedural Pain and Anxiety During Venipuncture in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

BackgroundVenipuncture is one of the most frequent and frightening medical procedures for children. This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate whether pre-procedural immersive virtual reality (VR) education could decrease pain and anxiety during venipuncture procedure of children.MethodsSixty children scheduled for venipuncture at the phlebotomy unit were randomized into either the control or VR group. Before the procedure, children of the control group received conventional simple verbal instructions, whereas those of the VR group experienced a 4-min VR education regarding venipuncture. The primary outcome was the pain and anxiety of pediatric patients assessed with the children’s hospital of eastern ontario pain scale. Secondary outcomes were parental satisfaction, venipuncture time, repeated procedure and procedural difficulty rated by phlebotomists.ResultsThe pain and anxiety score during the procedure was significantly lower in the VR group than in the control group (median [IQR], 6.0 [5.0–7.0] vs. 8.0 [6.0–9.8], P = 0.001). Parental satisfaction about the procedural process were higher in the VR group than in the control group (P = 0.029), and the degree of procedural difficulty was lower in the VR group, compared to the control group (P = 0.026).ConclusionThe preprocedural VR education significantly reduced pain and anxiety of children and decreased the procedural difficulty of phlebotomists during venipuncture procedure.Clinical Trial RegistrationUniversity hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: UMIN000042968, date of registration: January 9, 2021, URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049043).

Beyond Needles: Pioneering Pediatric Care with Virtual Reality (VR) for TIVAD Access in Oncology

“…However, studies focusing on TIVAD puncture procedures in pediatric oncology patients are relatively limited [9]. Notably, prior investigations have predominantly centered on evaluating VR's efficacy in mitigating pain [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and distress [5] during venous puncture or port access procedures in this patient population. As outlined in the review by Malloy et al [2], while these studies have provided insights, their conclusions have been somewhat constrained by the limitations associated with small sample sizes.…”

“…Recent literature has highlighted virtual reality (VR) as a non-pharmacological approach in various settings and for numerous purposes, yet evidence regarding its efficacy and acceptability in pediatrics remains limited [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Thus, by comprehensively investigating the impact of VR goggles as a distraction technique during TIVAD access, this study seeks to contribute valuable insights to the existing body of literature on pediatric pain management.…”

Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality: potential clinical and training applications in pediatrics

“…30) The aim of the major clinical study was to alleviate fear, pain, and anxiety experienced by children during invasive procedures such as blood drawing, 31) phlebotomy, 32) and venipuncture. [33][34][35] Intravenous injection [36][37][38][39][40][41] PIVC insertion, 42) chest radiography, 43,44) and port needle insertion 45,46) in pediatric patients. Some studies also focused on surgical…”

Safety and quality in paediatric procedural sedation: what really matters?

“…Distraction with the help of movies or video games on a tablet computer has been shown to reduce children's anxiety levels during diagnostic and interventional procedures [61–63]. New technologies such as virtual reality are also being used successfully in paediatric procedural sedation [64,65 ▪ ,66,67]. In summary, supplementary nonpharmacological techniques should always be used, but pharmacological sedation should always be provided if nonpharmacological techniques fail.…”