2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030731
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation on Burned Hands: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind Study

Abstract: Hands are the most frequent burn injury sites. Appropriate rehabilitation is essential to ensure good functional recovery. Virtual reality (VR)-based rehabilitation has proven to be beneficial for the functional recovery of the upper extremities. We investigated and compared VR-based rehabilitation with conventional rehabilitation (CON) in patients with burned hands. Fifty-seven patients were randomized into a VR or CON group. Each intervention was applied to the affected hand for four weeks, and clinical and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may discourage patients especially children from complying with their physical therapy [55]. VR technology gains a growing interest as an alternative for managing pain in adolescents with burn injuries, as indicated by many successful controlled studies with children and adults [56].…”
Section: A Vr For Burn Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may discourage patients especially children from complying with their physical therapy [55]. VR technology gains a growing interest as an alternative for managing pain in adolescents with burn injuries, as indicated by many successful controlled studies with children and adults [56].…”
Section: A Vr For Burn Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the included studies, five studies were conducted as pilot randomized controlled trials [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Three studies each were designed as pilot studies [ 25 , 26 , 27 ] and randomized controlled trials [ 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Sample size ranged from six to 57 participants when intervention and control groups were summed up.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jebsen−Taylor hand function test (JTT) was used to measure the performance speed of standardized tasks. The JTT consists of seven subtests, each scored on a scale of 0-15, with a higher score indicative of better hand function [16]. In the Perdue pegboard test (PPT), motor function is measured by the number of pins that can be placed in the board (along two parallel rows with 25 holes each) in 30 s, and dexterity is measured by the number of pins, washers, and collars that can be assembled in 60 s. Scores were evaluated for the affected right (dominant) hand and both hands [17].…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%