1999
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of varying the local propensity to form secondary structure on the stability and folding kinetics of a rapid folding mixed α/β protein: characterization of a truncation mutant of the N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9 1 1Edited by P. E. Wright

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…32,33 The fragment lacks the C-terminal α-helix; however, experimental work has shown that formation of this helix and its docking to the β-α-β core is not part of the rate-limiting step in the folding of NTL9. 34 Horng et al chose to study the K12M mutant since it folds faster, 33 making it more attractive for computational studies; however, the folding rate is of the same magnitude as that of wild-type NTL9 1-39 . The calculations were approximate since the implicit solvent model used did not change with temperature; that is, it had not been parameterized to reproduce the temperature dependence of the hydrophobic effect and solvent properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…32,33 The fragment lacks the C-terminal α-helix; however, experimental work has shown that formation of this helix and its docking to the β-α-β core is not part of the rate-limiting step in the folding of NTL9. 34 Horng et al chose to study the K12M mutant since it folds faster, 33 making it more attractive for computational studies; however, the folding rate is of the same magnitude as that of wild-type NTL9 1-39 . The calculations were approximate since the implicit solvent model used did not change with temperature; that is, it had not been parameterized to reproduce the temperature dependence of the hydrophobic effect and solvent properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The relative importance of secondary versus tertiary interactions in determining folding rates was studied experimentally for a number of proteins, including the activation domain of carboxypeptyidase A (CPA) (84), CheY (84), the helical coiled-coil GCN4 (32,82,85,116), GB1 domain (19), its structural homologue protein L (57a), λ-repressor (12), and ribosomal protein L9 (73). In all cases, secondary interactions play no role or only a minor one in determining folding kinetics.…”
Section: Diffusion-collision Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…85,86 In the present study, we compare the folding cooperativity of NTL9 and two homologous peripheral subunitbinding domain (PSBD) proteins (PDB IDs: 1W4E and 2BTH), for which experimental structural and folding data are available. 30,32,73,87 Among these three proteins, each of the two PSBD proteins has a clearly different native topology from that of NTL9, whereas the two PSBD homologs have essentially identical folds with only subtle differences in packing. Application of our approach outlined above suggests strongly that native topology is predictive of and probably constraining on folding cooperativity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%