1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4238(96)00948-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of varying sulphate concentrations on growth, physiology and yield of the greenhouse tomato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To equalize the electrical conductivity (EC) of nutrient solutions across treatments (to avoid confounding the effects of EC with treatments), the concentrations of chloride (Cl) , sulphur (S) and sodium (Na) were allowed to vary in the range of 100-180, 70-150 and 40-80 mg L -1 , respectively. The variations of Cl, S and Na in these ranges of concentration would not have any significant effect on greenhouse tomatoes (Lopez et al 1996;Voogt and Sonneveld 1997;Nukaya and Hashimoto 2000). The final EC of all nutrient solutions was 3 ± 0.2 dS m -1 .…”
Section: Nutrient Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To equalize the electrical conductivity (EC) of nutrient solutions across treatments (to avoid confounding the effects of EC with treatments), the concentrations of chloride (Cl) , sulphur (S) and sodium (Na) were allowed to vary in the range of 100-180, 70-150 and 40-80 mg L -1 , respectively. The variations of Cl, S and Na in these ranges of concentration would not have any significant effect on greenhouse tomatoes (Lopez et al 1996;Voogt and Sonneveld 1997;Nukaya and Hashimoto 2000). The final EC of all nutrient solutions was 3 ± 0.2 dS m -1 .…”
Section: Nutrient Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, after the adjustment in the fertilizer inputs in 1997, their concentrations were in acceptable ranges. The highest S concentration in 1997 was 200 mg L -1 ; this S concentration was not harmful to plant growth (Nukaya et al 1991;Lopez et al 1996). Several studies on Ca/Mg nutrition of greenhouse tomato (Sonneveld 1987;Hao and Papadopoulos, unpublished data) have demonstrated that plant growth and fruit yield in the latter growth stage benefited from high concentration of Ca and Mg.…”
Section: Nutrient Dynamics and Fertigation Management In Closed Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Nukaya et al (1991) found that the yield of tomato was not affected in a long-term tomato crop with S ranging from 160 ppm to 320 ppm. Lopez et al (1996) reported that tomato can tolerate S up to 650 ppm in a short experiment when the ratios between the major elements and S are appropriate. The S concentration in our 1996 experiment was not likely to have reached this high level, even in the late stage of the experiment.…”
Section: After Planting Was Higher Than In the Open Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and resulted 19% yield reduction was observed in this study. The accumulation of SO 4 2-in the recycled nutrient solution is a common phenomenon in the closed soilless culture, which has been implicated to restrict the yield of tomatoes grown in NFT (Lopez et al, 1996;Zekki et al, 1996).…”
Section: Fruit Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%