1983
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(83)81860-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Varying Particle Size of Forage on Digestion and Chewing Behavior of Dairy Heifers

Abstract: Eighteen Holstein heifers were fed long and chopped coarse and fine alfalfa hay ad libitum to evaluate effects of physical form on digestion and chemical composition of feed and fecal particles and to examine the applicability of a sinusoidal model to chewing behavior. Recordings of jaw movement were divided into 1-h segments for analysis. Least square mean size of fecal particles from coarse and finely chopped diets were 290 and 297 micrometers as compared to 227 micrometers on long hay. Intakes of dry matter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
1
8

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
45
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, daily rumination time was probably not limited by daily eating time in the present study, as it did not differ between the long and chopped silage treatments whereas daily eating and chewing times did. The daily rumination time was within the normal range of 8 to 9 h per day given by Welch (1982) and comparable with results from other studies with growing cattle (Deswysen and Vanbelle, 1978;Jaster and Murphy, 1983;Teller et al, 1993).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, daily rumination time was probably not limited by daily eating time in the present study, as it did not differ between the long and chopped silage treatments whereas daily eating and chewing times did. The daily rumination time was within the normal range of 8 to 9 h per day given by Welch (1982) and comparable with results from other studies with growing cattle (Deswysen and Vanbelle, 1978;Jaster and Murphy, 1983;Teller et al, 1993).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The higher eating rate but shorter eating time of chopped WCBS compared with long can be explained by the lower need for chewing per kg DM and NDF during ingestion of the chopped silage. Similarly, Jaster and Murphy (1983) found shorter daily eating time for chopped lucerne hay compared with long and Deswysen and Vanbelle (1978) found shorter eating time for chopped grass silage compared with long when fed to dairy heifers. Main effects of maturity (M) and physical form (F): *P , 0.05; **P , 0.01; ***P , 0.001; T 5 tendency (0.05 , P , 0.1).…”
Section: Intakementioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations