Effects of varying involvement level within a television program on recall of cognitive versus affective advertisement

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore how different involvement levels within a single television program influence recall of cognitive vs affective advertisements aired during that television program. Design/methodology/approach Two studies of 2 (program involvement: high vs low) × 2 (advertisement involvement: cognitive vs affective) between subject design were conducted; one study was for cognitive program and other study was for affective program. Existing scales were used after conducting reliability and validity tests. Findings The influence of different levels of involvement with a television program on recall of cognitive and affective advertisements was found. Specifically, recall of cognitive advertisement was found to be higher when involvement with television program is low than when involvement with program is high. Recall of affective advertisement was found to be lower when involvement with program is low than when involvement with program is high. Practical implications Results indicate that cognitive advertisements are recalled more at point of low involvement with program, whereas affective advertisements are recalled at point of high involvement with program. The implications are in the field of understanding and making advertisement airing decisions. Originality/value When the television program progresses, the story tends to build, and hence, the involvement increases. Therefore, involvement level with the program at initial point and later point can vary. This study identified the possibility of cognitive advertisement being recalled more at initial point of a television program, i.e. at low involvement, and affective advertisement being recalled more at the later point of the same television program, i.e. at high involvement.

Television viewing and conspicuous consumption of households: evidence from India

“…Television due to its wide reach and acceptance remains one of the most popular means of entertainment and marketers extensively rely on it for reaching their target audience (Soni, 2017). Our study supports the attractiveness of televisions as a medium complementing below-the-line media, such as social networks, word-of-mouth communications, theatre and product demonstrations, highlighted in previous research (Viswanathan and Rosa, 2010;Chikweche and Fletcher, 2011), for reaching BoP consumers.…”

“…Despite their significant contributions, previous studies examining the influence of television viewing duration on viewers' conspicuous consumption leave three issues unexplored. First, while they examine the influence of television viewing on consumer attitude and behavioral intentions (O'guinn and Shrum, 1997;Shrum et al, 2005;Priya et al, 2010), consumers' socialization (Vijayalakshmi et al, 2019) and advertisement recall (Soni, 2017;Holiday et al, 2018), they fail to measure its effect on the expenditure incurred on conspicuous consumption, which has more direct relevance for firms' revenue and profits (Swait and Sweeney, 2000). Second, these studies primarily focus on individual consumers and pay little attention to households despite their influence on the decision-making process of consumers, in general (Martínez and Polo, 1999), and for BoP consumers, in particular (Chikweche et al, 2012).…”

Analysis of effective recall in radio advertising

“…Further, rational ads wear out faster than emotional ads (Bruce et al, 2017). Likewise, the study by Soni (2017) shows that rational ads are more effective in low involvement programs and emotional ads are more effective in high involvement programs.…”

Ads in gaming apps: experiential value of gamers

“…In other words, CI emphasizes individuals' rational processing activities and the accomplishment of idealization states. In contrast, AI emphasizes individuals' accomplishments of specific emotional states which demonstrate moods and feelings aroused by an object (Soni, 2017). In a review paper, Geetika et al (2017, p. 341) indicate that "scholars argued about the importance of customer involvement in the form of passive or active participation to enhance value in experience".…”