1967
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0460368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Varying Dietary Ratios of Magnesium, Calcium and Phosphorus in Growing Chicks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings agree with the report of Chicco et al (1967). These findings agree with the report of Chicco et al (1967).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings agree with the report of Chicco et al (1967). These findings agree with the report of Chicco et al (1967).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This interaction was a result of the tibia ash being significantly depressed when magnesium was added to the diets containing soft phosphate. This increased growth response from supplemental magnesium agrees with the findings of Chicco et al (1967), and adds support to the theory that magnesium, under certain conditions, can spare calcium. This depression barely met the level of statistical significance Magnesium supplementation of diets containing either soft phosphate or monosodium phosphate resulted in a slight reduction of body weights in ten of the twelve diets fed (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Damron and Harms (1968) used builders' sand to bring diets up to 100 percent. Chicco et al (1967) used solka-fioc for the same purpose and Waldroup et al (1965) utilized pulverized oat hulls. In an attempt to regulate the nutrient intake of laying hens Gleaves et al (1963) used polyethylene fluff as a volume control ingredient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…magnesium in the diet caused reduced growth in young chicks (Chicco et al, 1967) while 6,400p.p.m. caused reduced growth and high mortality (Nugara and Edwards, 1963).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%