2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of various sizes of cenospheres on microstructural, mechanical, and thermal properties of high-strength and lightweight cementitious composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haddadian et al [22] used coal bottom ash and found that CBA(0%) had 12.96% water absorption, while CBA(25%) had 20.15%. Majhi et al [24] found that SF(0%) had 17.1% water absorption, but adding SF(10%) reduced it to 11.3%. Kim [26] found that adding 50% slag and CS resulted in 33.71% water absorption, while adding 50% slag alone increased it to 36.20%.…”
Section: Durability Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Haddadian et al [22] used coal bottom ash and found that CBA(0%) had 12.96% water absorption, while CBA(25%) had 20.15%. Majhi et al [24] found that SF(0%) had 17.1% water absorption, but adding SF(10%) reduced it to 11.3%. Kim [26] found that adding 50% slag and CS resulted in 33.71% water absorption, while adding 50% slag alone increased it to 36.20%.…”
Section: Durability Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beddu et al[23] investigation discovered that utilizing cenosphere instead of ordinary cement boosted the concrete's strength by 59.6% to 28.8 Mpa. Majhi et al[24] research revealed that employing silica fume as a cement substitute resulted in a strength of 30 Mpa, but without the substitution, the strength reduced by 6.25% to 32 Mpa. Yang et al[25]experiment discovered that utilizing CS as a substitute for cement resulted in a strength of 60 Mpa, but using SF resulted in a strength of 92 Mpa, a 34.78% reduction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%