1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79774-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of variance in mini amplitude on stimulus-evoked release: a comparison of two models

Abstract: The strength of synaptic connections between two neurons is characterized by the number of release sites (N) on the presynaptic cell, the probability (p) of transmitter release at those sites in response to a stimulus, and the average size (A) of the postsynaptic response from each site. Quantal analysis can determine N, p, and A, but the large variance in the amplitudes of minis at central synapses is predicted to obscure quantal peaks and render quantal analysis unusable. Recently it has been suggested that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of miniature amplitudes was skewed to the right, as has been reported for other synapses (Bekkers et al, 1990;Frerking and Wilson, 1996) and could be well fit by an equation based on a Gaussian distribution of synaptic vesicle diameters (Bekkers et al, 1990). The mean mini amplitude in 20 cultures ranged from 0.35 to 1.42 mV (mean 0.717 Ϯ 0.272 SD), with a coefficient of variation (cv) that ranged from 0.52 to 0.99 (mean 0.699 Ϯ 0.125 SD).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distribution of miniature amplitudes was skewed to the right, as has been reported for other synapses (Bekkers et al, 1990;Frerking and Wilson, 1996) and could be well fit by an equation based on a Gaussian distribution of synaptic vesicle diameters (Bekkers et al, 1990). The mean mini amplitude in 20 cultures ranged from 0.35 to 1.42 mV (mean 0.717 Ϯ 0.272 SD), with a coefficient of variation (cv) that ranged from 0.52 to 0.99 (mean 0.699 Ϯ 0.125 SD).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…18 of Frerking and Wilson (1996), modified by dividing the numerator and denominator of their left-hand term by m 2 , the square of the quantal amplitude in their notation] where V and M are the variance and the mean of the PSP, q is the quantal amplitude, cv is the coefficient of variation of the quantal amplitude, and W is the fraction (which can range from 0 to 1) of the quantal variance that originates from intrasite variability. The two extreme cases occur when all of the variability is either intrasite or intersite.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical relationship for a synaptic connection with non-uniform Pr and non-uniform q but with no correlation between these two parameters is shown in eqn (8) (see Frerking &Wilson 1996):…”
Section: Nmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two types of quantal variance affect the relationship between variance (or CV) and synaptic conductance in different ways (Wahl, Stratford, Larkman & Jack, 1995;Frerking & Wilson 1996; see also Sigworth, 1980, for equivalent situation with ion channel subconductance levels), and can complicate the interpretation of quantal parameters estimated with the binomial model. At high release probabilities (Pr 1), only variance arising from intrasite quantal variation remains.…”
Section: Extension Of the Simple Binomial Model To Include Variabilitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation