2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of variability in ambient vibration data on model updating and damage identification of a 10-story building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to numerical finite element analyses and analytical calculation, nondestructive ambient vibration examinations are widely conducted to get the dynamic features in functioning condition without any external forces. A vast amount of literature can be found regarding the finite element model updating of steel structures, 13–20 reinforced concrete structures, 21–27 base isolated structures, 28 timber structures, 29,30 and masonry structures 31–36 . However, there are very limited studies about the ambient vibration test‐based system identification and FEM updating of concrete steel composite structures 37–39 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to numerical finite element analyses and analytical calculation, nondestructive ambient vibration examinations are widely conducted to get the dynamic features in functioning condition without any external forces. A vast amount of literature can be found regarding the finite element model updating of steel structures, 13–20 reinforced concrete structures, 21–27 base isolated structures, 28 timber structures, 29,30 and masonry structures 31–36 . However, there are very limited studies about the ambient vibration test‐based system identification and FEM updating of concrete steel composite structures 37–39 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damages can occur in a structure's service lifetime because of several reasons such as overloading, extreme seismic loading, thermal expansion, different settlement, blast, impact loading, and dynamic vibration 40,41 . The location, type, and severity of damage are very important to structural safety assessment 25 . Several approaches are being used to detect and identify the damage status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural vibration data has popularly been used in the field for system identification (Juang and Pappa, 1985;James III et al, 1993;Andersen, 1997;Huang, 2001;Pakzad et al, 2011;Dorvash and Pakzad, 2012;Pakzad, 2013, 2014;Dorvash et al, 2013;Cara et al, 2014;Matarazzo and Pakzad, 2016c;Nagarajaiah and Chen, 2016), finite element model updating (Shahidi and Pakzad, 2014a,b;Yousefianmoghadam et al, 2016;Nozari et al, 2017;Song et al, 2017), and damage-sensitive feature extraction (Sohn et al, 2001;Gul and Catbas, 2009;Kullaa, 2009;Dorvash et al, 2015;Shahidi et al, 2015), with the ultimate goal of inferring information about the current condition of the monitored structure. Regarding regression models, He and De Roeck (1997) shows their utility for describing structural vibration responses, and Shahidi et al (2015) and Yao and Pakzad (2012) provide structural damage-sensitive features created using the parameters of regression models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these approaches are straightforward and easy to implement, only using the resonance frequency data could not ensure successful model updating (Salawu 1997). Alternatively, other modal properties, such as mode shapes and modal flexibility, are included in the optimization objective function to utilize more information and thus provide better updating results (Jaishi and Ren 2006;Koh and Shankar 2003;Moaveni et al 2013;Nozari et al 2017;Sanayei et al 2001;Yousefianmoghadam et al 2018;Zhang and Johnson 2013). To this end, the modal dynamic residual approach accomplishes FE model updating by forming an optimization problem that minimizes the residuals of the generalized eigenvalue equations in structural dynamics (Farhat and Hemez 1993;Kosmatka and Ricles 1999;Zhu et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%