Effects of UV filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor during early development of Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858

Araújo, Mário Jorge; Rocha, Rui J. M.; Soares, Amadeu M.V.M.; Benedé, Juan L.; Chisvert, Alberto; Monteiro, Marta S.

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.112

Cited by 48 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 73 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Several studies have demonstrated that some of these compounds can disrupt survival [12][13][14]. behavior [15,16], growth [14,17,18], development [19,20], metabolism [21][22][23], gene expression [24,25] and reproduction [15,26,27] in various species. It should be noted that most toxicological studies on organic UV filters were conducted on BP3, EMC and 4-MBC [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of 10 UV Filters on the Brine Shrimp Artemia salina and the Marine Microalga Tetraselmis sp.

Thorel

Clergeaud

Jaugeon

et al. 2020

Toxics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The presence of pharmaceutical and personal care product (PPCP) residues in the aquatic environment is an emerging issue due to their uncontrolled release through gray water, and accumulation in the environment that may affect living organisms, ecosystems and public health. The aim of this study is to assess the toxicity of benzophenone-3 (BP-3), bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol methoxyphenyl triazine (BEMT), butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane (BM), methylene bis-benzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol (MBBT), 2-ethylhexyl salicylate (ES), diethylaminohydroxybenzoyl hexyl benzoate (DHHB), diethylhexyl butamido triazone (DBT), ethylhexyl triazone (ET), homosalate (HS) and octocrylene (OC) on marine organisms from two major trophic levels, including autotrophs (Tetraselmis sp.) and heterotrophs (Artemia salina). In general, results showed that both HS and OC were the most toxic UV filters for our tested species, followed by a significant effect of BM on Artemia salina due to BM—but only at high concentrations (1 mg/L). ES, BP3 and DHHB affected the metabolic activity of the microalgae at 100 µg/L. BEMT, DBT, ET, MBBT had no effect on the tested organisms, even at high concentrations (2 mg/L). OC toxicity represents a risk for those species, since concentrations used in this study are 15–90 times greater than those reported in occurrence studies for aquatic environments. For the first time in the literature, we report HS toxicity on a microalgae species at concentrations complementing those found in aquatic environments. These preliminary results could represent a risk in the future if concentrations of OC and HS continue to increase.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of 10 UV Filters on the Brine Shrimp Artemia salina and the Marine Microalga Tetraselmis sp.

Thorel

Clergeaud

Jaugeon

et al. 2020

Toxics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…UV filters are of emerging concern due to their large production volumes, the increasing coastal tourism, their persistence related to their chemical properties, and their toxicity (Raineri et al, 2017). Previous studies reported the occurrence of UV filters ranging from nano to microgram per liter in different biotopes (rivers (Kameda et al, 2011;Fent et al, 2010), lakes (Balmer et al, 2005;Fagervold et al, 2019;Langford et al, 2015), coastal waters (Fagervold et al, 2019;Tovar-Sánchez et al, 2013;Apel et al, 2018;Sánchez Rodríguez et al, 2015;Tsui et al, 2019;Sankoda et al, 2015) and sediments (Kameda et al, 2011;Fagervold et al, 2019;Mitchelmore et al, 2019)) but also demonstrated their bioaccumulation and toxic effects on several aquatic organisms (algae (Mao et al, 2018;Seoane et al, 2017), coral (Mitchelmore et al, 2019;He et al, 2019;Tsui et al, 2017), benthic mollusks (Giraldo, 2017), fishes (Araújo et al, 2018), dolphin (Alonso et al, 2015;Gago-Ferrero et al, 2013)), considering a wide variety of toxicological endpoints. Organic UV filters showed variable photostability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toxicity of UV filters on marine bacteria: Combined effects with damaging solar radiation

Lozano

Matallana-Surget

Givens

et al. 2020

Science of The Total Environment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Previous works have shown that 4-MBC affects development, behavior and biochemical endpoints during larval stages of amphibians (Martins et al, 2017) and freshwater (Li et al, 2016;Torres et al, 2016;Quintaneiro et al, 2019) or marine sh (Araújo et al, 2018). Endocrine action of 4-MBC has been previously reported (Krause et al, 2012;Ozáez et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2016), which included androgen and oestrogen activity and effects on reproductive organs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Flat sh, such as Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858), have been increasingly used in European marine aquaculture industry (Imsland et al, 2003;Morais et al, 2016). Besides, their complex and fast life cycle are interesting for ecotoxicological studies (Pimentel et al, 2015;Pavlaki et al, 2016;Araújo et al, 2018;2019;2020). The eggs can be obtained from wild spawners in rearing facilities in Southern Europe throughout the year (Imsland et al, 2003;Anguis and Cañavate, 2005;Morais et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exposure effects of the UV-filter 4-MBC to "Solea senegalensis" metamorphosis

Araújo

Soares

Monteiro

2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many personal care products integrate UV-filters, such as 4-methylbenzylidene camphor (4-MBC) which has been detected in aquatic habitats. Possible effects of 4-MBC to aquatic organisms have been poorly studied. Therefore, the main objective of this work is to study the effects of 4-MBC exposure to Solea senegalensis during metamorphosis, a sensitive life stage of this flatfish. To achieve this, at the beginning of metamorphosis (13 days after hatching, dah) fish were exposed to 4-MBC (0.2–2.0 mg L− 1) for 48 h. After this period, fish were transferred to clean medium and were fed and maintained until more than 80% of fish in control group completed the metamorphosis (24 dah). Mortality, malformations and metamorphosis progression were studied on a daily basis. In addition, growth, behavior and biochemical markers of neurotransmission (acetylcholinesterase, AChE), oxidative stress (catalase, CAT; glutathione S-transferase, GST, and lipid peroxidation, LPO) and anaerobic metabolism (lactate dehydrogenase, LDH) were determined at the end of the experiment. An acceleration of metamorphosis progression was observed during and 2 days after the 4-MBC exposure in all concentrations tested. In addition, decreased length, inhibition of CAT activity and induction of oxidative damage (LOEC = 0.928 mg L− 1 4-MBC for length, CAT and LPO) were observed. A short-term exposure to 4-MBC at the onset of metamorphosis, a critical period of development, affected S. senegalensis at several levels of organization, even after nine days in clean medium, including growth and metamorphosis progression, suggesting possible long-term adverse effects to this species.

show abstract

Effects of UV filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor during early development of Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858

Cited by 48 publications

References 73 publications

Effect of 10 UV Filters on the Brine Shrimp Artemia salina and the Marine Microalga Tetraselmis sp.

Effect of 10 UV Filters on the Brine Shrimp Artemia salina and the Marine Microalga Tetraselmis sp.

Toxicity of UV filters on marine bacteria: Combined effects with damaging solar radiation

Exposure effects of the UV-filter 4-MBC to "Solea senegalensis" metamorphosis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About