1973
DOI: 10.1016/0023-9690(73)90030-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of US-Presentation and CS-termination contingencies on avoidance extinction following partial and continuous reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, on a nonreinforced avoidance trial the CS is followed by the aversive stimulus irrespective of the animal's behavior, i.e ., the subject receives a CS-DS pairing. Studies of PR in discriminative avoidance in which nonreinforcement has been so defined Galvani, 1971Galvani, , 1973aGalvani, , 1973bOlson, Davenport, & Kamichoff, 1971) (B rush, 1962 ;Kurtz & Shafer, 1967;Levine & England, 1960;Pinckney, 19 66). Accordingly, the present experiment investigated sh uttlebox avoidance acquisition and extinction under PR and continuous reinforcement in animals trained at either a short (3D-sec) or long (90-sec) IT!.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, on a nonreinforced avoidance trial the CS is followed by the aversive stimulus irrespective of the animal's behavior, i.e ., the subject receives a CS-DS pairing. Studies of PR in discriminative avoidance in which nonreinforcement has been so defined Galvani, 1971Galvani, , 1973aGalvani, , 1973bOlson, Davenport, & Kamichoff, 1971) (B rush, 1962 ;Kurtz & Shafer, 1967;Levine & England, 1960;Pinckney, 19 66). Accordingly, the present experiment investigated sh uttlebox avoidance acquisition and extinction under PR and continuous reinforcement in animals trained at either a short (3D-sec) or long (90-sec) IT!.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%