2006
DOI: 10.1130/g22633.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of urbanization on watershed hydrology: The scaling of discharge with drainage area

Abstract: Galster et al. (2006) use questionable data for two Pennsylvanian streams to misconstrue the dependence of streamfl ow on watershed area and urbanization. Their fi rst equation, Q = kA c , relates fl ow rate 'Q' (m 3 /s) to drainage area 'A' (m 2), using 'k,' "a measure of river base fl ow (m/s)" and 'c', "the scaling power dependency" (Galster, et al., 2006, p. 713) Their Table 3 reports both positive and negative values for k, and redefi nes its units as m 3 /s. Instead, Equation 1 requires that k be positiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
51
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3). A linear relationship between upstream drainage area and discharge has been commonly assumed in small basins (e.g., Pazzaglia et al, 1998;Montgomery and Gran, 2001), but for larger rivers this relationship may become nonlinear if the basin includes variations in geology, tectonic deformation, climate, or land use (Stall and Fok, 1968;Galster et al, 2006;Tague and Grant, 2004). To account for these variations, we developed discharge-drainage area relationships for individual sub-basins using values of discharge and drainage area for all USGS stations with ≥ 10 years of approved mean annual discharge.…”
Section: Construction Of Downstream Hydraulic Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). A linear relationship between upstream drainage area and discharge has been commonly assumed in small basins (e.g., Pazzaglia et al, 1998;Montgomery and Gran, 2001), but for larger rivers this relationship may become nonlinear if the basin includes variations in geology, tectonic deformation, climate, or land use (Stall and Fok, 1968;Galster et al, 2006;Tague and Grant, 2004). To account for these variations, we developed discharge-drainage area relationships for individual sub-basins using values of discharge and drainage area for all USGS stations with ≥ 10 years of approved mean annual discharge.…”
Section: Construction Of Downstream Hydraulic Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land use can also change the concentration and/or optical quality of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) transported from the watershed (Frost et al, 2005). Conversion of forest to agricultural or urban land use, for example, can change the quantity and grain size distribution of sediment contributed to the stream (Kondolf et al, 2002), which has implications for stream channel morphology (Leopold et al, 1964;Pizzuto et al, 2000;Galster et al, 2006). For example, transition to a wider, shallower channel increases UVR exposure on the benthos.…”
Section: Land Use Effects On Stream Optical Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, transition to a wider, shallower channel increases UVR exposure on the benthos. Loss of riparian vegetation can have the direct effect of causing an instantaneous, localized increase in UVR flux reaching the stream (DeNicola et al, 1992;Kelly et al, 2003;Brown et al, 1994) or indirectly increase benthic exposure to UVR through bank destabilization (Hession et al, 2003), which could also lead to channel widening and shallowing (Galster et al, 2006). Current lack of understanding of how upland hillslope form and geomorphic process influence many of the environmental parameters that influence UVR transparency is a critical limitation on the development of broadly applicable, predictive models of UVR penetration in streams.…”
Section: Land Use Effects On Stream Optical Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human development of watersheds, particularly urbanization and agriculture, has a strong impact on the quality and ecological functions of aquatic systems (Booth and Jackson, 1997;King et al, 2005;Galster et al, 2006;Brown et al, 2009;Johnson and Host, 2010). Urbanization is typically positively correlated with the concentrations and loads of many contaminants, including nutrients, sediments, heavy metals, petroleum products, salts, fecal indicator bacteria, organic contaminants and others (Paul and Meyer, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%