2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of urban tree pruning on ecosystem services performance

Desirée Muscas,
Fabio Orlandi,
Roberto Petrucci
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, newly planted or ancient individuals have suboptimal performance compared to parks with both young and adult trees, highlighting the importance of having unevenly aged trees simultaneously to optimizing the environmental performances over the mediumto long-term. Additionally, being related to the tree size [40,41] and the designed space available for their growth [20,42,43], the pruning typology performed by the administration may influence their ecosystem services performance [21]. For example, extraordinary pruning with the removal of more than 50% of the crown may decrease the carbon stored by trees, unbalance tree growth, and reduce the LA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, newly planted or ancient individuals have suboptimal performance compared to parks with both young and adult trees, highlighting the importance of having unevenly aged trees simultaneously to optimizing the environmental performances over the mediumto long-term. Additionally, being related to the tree size [40,41] and the designed space available for their growth [20,42,43], the pruning typology performed by the administration may influence their ecosystem services performance [21]. For example, extraordinary pruning with the removal of more than 50% of the crown may decrease the carbon stored by trees, unbalance tree growth, and reduce the LA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Clivut project proposes, as good practice, reducing the pruning intervals, limiting the wood asportation to a maximum of 25% of the crown, and absolutely avoiding cutting branches with diameters greater than 15 cm. According to the LIFE Clivut results [21], with the same management conditions, the best-performing tree species individuated were the Cedrus spp. and some species of the Pinus genera for conifers and Celtis australis, Ulmus spp., Tilia spp., Quercus ilex, and Populus spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equations most responsive to the characteristics of the plants involved in this study were chosen. The "Lifeclivuttreedb" platform, based on the species identification and DBH sampling, evaluated the height and age of each tree, providing carbon storage estimates expressed in tons of CO 2 equivalent [19]. Carbon storage was based on the different ages, crown sizes, growth rates and pruning techniques for estimating tree biomass through volumetric equations (m 3 /tree) from diameter to breast height (DBH in centimeters) and crown height (h in meters).…”
Section: Co 2 Stock Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%