2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01851.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of upstream lakes and nutrient limitation on periphytic biomass and nitrogen fixation in oligotrophic, subalpine streams

Abstract: Summary 1. We conducted bioassays of nutrient limitation to understand how macronutrients and the position of streams relative to lakes control nitrogen (N2) fixation and periphytic biomass in three oligotrophic Rocky Mountain catchments. We measured periphytic chlorophyll‐a (chl‐a) and nitrogen‐fixation responses to nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) additions using nutrient‐diffusing substrata at 19 stream study sites, located above and below lakes within the study catchments. 2. We found that periphytic chl‐a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
38
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(81 reference statements)
6
38
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nutrient limitation.-Nutrient limitation of biofilms was determined following treatment application in 2008 using nutrient diffusing substrates (NDS; Tank et al 2006, Marcarelli andWurtsbaugh 2007). Plastic vials measuring 37-mL were filled with nutrient-enriched 2% agar and capped with a 2.6-cm diameter fritted glass disk (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA).…”
Section: Biofilm Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nutrient limitation.-Nutrient limitation of biofilms was determined following treatment application in 2008 using nutrient diffusing substrates (NDS; Tank et al 2006, Marcarelli andWurtsbaugh 2007). Plastic vials measuring 37-mL were filled with nutrient-enriched 2% agar and capped with a 2.6-cm diameter fritted glass disk (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA).…”
Section: Biofilm Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decline of Pacific salmon has fueled concern about declining ecosystem productivity, termed oligotrophication, following loss of material and nutrient subsidies (Stockner et al 2000). For example, in the headwaters of the Snake and Salmon Rivers in central Idaho, dramatic declines in salmon returns (McClure et al 2003) and continued outmigration of juvenile fish (Scheuerell et al 2005, Kohler et al 2013, coupled with extremely low geologic, atmospheric, and anthropogenic nutrient sources, have been linked to very low background nutrient concentrations and consistent nutrient limitation of stream biofilms (Thomas et al 2003, Marcarelli and Wurtsbaugh 2007, Sanderson et al 2009). There is concern that reduced nutrient returns have led to decreases in primary and secondary production, in turn causing bottom-up limitation of juvenile salmon production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filamentous autotrophic N 2 fixers may also require a source of inorganic N to stimulate photosynthesis and carbon transfer from the photosynthetic cells to the heterocyst (Vitousek and Howarth 1991). others (2004, 2006) showed that a sufficient energy supply is needed from photosynthetic cells before N 2 fixation can occur, and this phenomenon could be evidenced by the fact that some nutrient addition experiments in oligotrophic systems have shown an inconsistent response of N 2 fixation to added N and P (for example, Marcarelli and Wurtsbaugh 2007). The idea that N or P may limit N 2 fixation in very oligotrophic systems has not been well evaluated but may help explain why compensatory N 2 fixation Although benthic processes are generally more important in oligotrophic systems than in more enriched systems, the response of benthic processes to nutrient enrichment is in part dependent upon lake geomorphology (Vadeboncoeur and others 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000;Neal et al 2008). However, these differences are not always sharp and, still, it is unclear how natural lakes are ecologically linked with their inlet and outlet rivers (Hillbricht-Ilkowska 1999;Marcarelli and Wurtsbaugh 2007). This interaction may have differentiated strength and might change, for example, due to the modification of nutrient availability (Kling et al 2000), hydrology or morphology (Arp et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow rivers have significant positive or negative influence on lake ecosystem or inversely, these ecosystems may also impact flow rivers (Hillbricht-Ilkowska 1999;Marcarelli and Wurtsbaugh 2007). Lakes, in relations to streams, have longer hydraulic retention times and, are characterised by domination of sedimentation and accumulation processes over erosion as well as advantage of autochthonous material over allochthonous, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%