2007
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112007006799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of upstream boundary layer on the unsteadiness of shock-induced separation

Abstract: The relationship between the upstream boundary layer and the low-frequency, large-scale unsteadiness of the separated flow in a Mach 2 compression ramp interaction is investigated by performing wide-field particle image velocimetry (PIV) and planar laser scattering (PLS) measurements in streamwise–spanwise planes. Planar laser scattering measurements in the upstream boundary layer indicate the presence of spanwise strips of elongated regions of uniform momentum with lengths greater than 40δ. These long coheren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

26
157
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(69 reference statements)
26
157
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The emergence of timeresolved particle image velocimetry (PIV) approaches made the above considerations possible. For example, Ganapathisubramani et al [18] have recently reported very long coherent structures of about fifty boundary-thicknesses long (termed "superstructures"), using PIV and Taylor's hypothesis (note that the use of Taylor's hypothesis may be valid as shown by Dennis and Nickels [8]). In their paper, one can find the scaling argument that the low frequency induced by the superstructure scales on U ∞ /2λ , where U ∞ is the upstream freestream velocity and λ the size of the superstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of timeresolved particle image velocimetry (PIV) approaches made the above considerations possible. For example, Ganapathisubramani et al [18] have recently reported very long coherent structures of about fifty boundary-thicknesses long (termed "superstructures"), using PIV and Taylor's hypothesis (note that the use of Taylor's hypothesis may be valid as shown by Dennis and Nickels [8]). In their paper, one can find the scaling argument that the low frequency induced by the superstructure scales on U ∞ /2λ , where U ∞ is the upstream freestream velocity and λ the size of the superstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganapathisubramani, Clemens & Dolling 2007a, Humble et al 2009). The present characterization of the boundary layer may contribute to this topic by providing reference data for the undisturbed turbulent flow structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two possible sources of the oscillation, upstream flow fluctuation or fluctuation propagating from the downstream of the shock wave. Ganapathisubramani et al [2,3] obtained a correlation between velocity fluctuation in the incoming flow and shock-foot motion; large-scale oscillation in the separation region had a low characteristic frequency, less than 1 kHz. Andreopoulos and Muck [4] argued that the turbulence of the incoming flow induced shock-wave oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%