2002
DOI: 10.2307/3270646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Unemployment Insurance Work-Search Requirements: The Maryland Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
56
3
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
56
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the results of Johnson and Klepinger (1994) and Klepinger et al (2002), their results do not indicate that verification of search behavior caused shorter unemployment spells 3 or lower total UI benefit payments.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In contrast to the results of Johnson and Klepinger (1994) and Klepinger et al (2002), their results do not indicate that verification of search behavior caused shorter unemployment spells 3 or lower total UI benefit payments.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In contrast to the results of Johnson and Klepinger (1994) and Klepinger et al (2002), their results do not indicate that verification of search behavior caused shorter unemployment spells or lower total UI benefit payments.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…These studies are based on field experiments and perform causality analysis distinguishing between treated/non treated groups, trying to assess whether the criteria imposed to be eligible for benefits affect or not search behaviour. The results of the conclusion of these studies are mixed: Klepinger et al (2002) performs a causality analysis using the data Maryland UI work-search demonstration (a plan that randomly assigned benefits recipients to different search criteria) and show that stricter criteria improved search efforts and reduced unemployment duration. Somehow differently, Ashenfelter et al (2005) exploit differences in the eligibility criteria of different American states (Connecticut, Massachusetts, Virginia and Tennessee) to conduct an experiment and finds out that stricter search criteria do not affect sensibly the access to benefits.…”
Section: The Unemployment Insurance Schemes In Finland Italy and Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%