2018
DOI: 10.5194/cp-14-1-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of undetected data quality issues on climatological analyses

Abstract: Abstract. Systematic data quality issues may occur at various stages of the data generation process. They may affect large fractions of observational datasets and remain largely undetected with standard data quality control. This study investigates the effects of such undetected data quality issues on the results of climatological analyses. For this purpose, we quality controlled daily observations of manned weather stations from the Central Andean area with a standard and an enhanced approach. The climate var… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
53
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(83 reference statements)
2
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Careful quality controls of climate data set are recommended by WMO (Klein Tank et al, 2009;WMO, 2011;Hunziker et al, 2017), as erroneous data can affect different aspects of climatic analysis. As an example, low data quality can produce inhomogeneities in time series and reduce the crosscorrelation between pairs of series, with a negative effect on the performance of any homogenization process (Hunziker et al, 2018). Serious data errors can also compromise the execution of homogenization programs (Domonkos and Coll, 2017a).…”
Section: Quality Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Careful quality controls of climate data set are recommended by WMO (Klein Tank et al, 2009;WMO, 2011;Hunziker et al, 2017), as erroneous data can affect different aspects of climatic analysis. As an example, low data quality can produce inhomogeneities in time series and reduce the crosscorrelation between pairs of series, with a negative effect on the performance of any homogenization process (Hunziker et al, 2018). Serious data errors can also compromise the execution of homogenization programs (Domonkos and Coll, 2017a).…”
Section: Quality Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SCIA the quality controls for temperature and precipitation daily records follow the work of Durre et al (2010) for the Global Historical Climatological Network (GHCN). These controls are cited in several climatological studies, like Ashcroft et al (2018) and Hunziker et al (2018). SCIA quality controls include (a) single series tests, which check the selfconsistency of each time series (i.e., basic integrity checks, outlier presence, temporal coherency); (b) multiple series tests, which assess the consistency of each time series with respect to a set of neighbouring stations (spatial controls).…”
Section: Quality Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increasing number of professional and amateur weather stations which provide meteorological information at high spatial and temporal resolution (i.e., sub-daily data), make fully automatic quality control (QC) and homogenization methods an essential tool for identifying and removing spurious measurements, as well as for adjusting the inhomogeneities from the series (Hunziker et al, 2018;Napoly et al, 2018). Numerous air temperature homogenization studies have been dedicated to monthly and daily data, including extremes, and focusing mainly on local and country scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides homogenization, quality control is an important issue in data processing, especially for the determination of extremes. However, Hunziker et al (2018) showed that the error of mean temperature trends depends strongly on whether the data are homogenized or not, whereas the kind of applied quality control is less important. As the aim is to derive trend errors of the raw data neither homogenization nor specific quality control is applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%