The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-005-0007-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on Diel Vertical Migration of Crustacean Zooplankton: An in situ Mesocosm Experiment

Abstract: The objective of this study was to expand the spatial scale of previous experiments on the effects of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on diel vertical migration (DVM) by freshwater zooplankton. We conducted an in situ mesocosm experiment in highly UVR transparent Lake Giles, Pennsylvania, in which we imposed two treatments: ambient UVR and UVR-shielded. Mesocosms (3440 L, 0.74 m diameter, 8 m deep) were large enough to include a spatial refuge from UVR and permit relatively large-scale DVM. Daphnia catawba adopted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
37
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In subsequent in situ experiments of a similar design in two lakes of differing transparency, UV stimulated a stronger downward migration in D. catawba than in diaptomid copepods or the cyclopoid copepod Cyclops scutifer in the more transparent lake, while no response to UV was observed in any of the zooplankton in the less transparent lake (Leech et al 2005a). In longerterm field experiments in 8-m-deep mesocosms that were either exposed to or shielded from UV, D. catawba showed a significant downward migration in response to UV, while the copepod L. minutus was more deeply distributed during day than at night but did not show a significant response to UV (Fischer et al 2006). Similarly, manipulation of UV in 3-m-deep field enclosures revealed no significant change in the daytime vertical distribution of the marine copepod Acartia hudsonica (Bollens and Frost 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In subsequent in situ experiments of a similar design in two lakes of differing transparency, UV stimulated a stronger downward migration in D. catawba than in diaptomid copepods or the cyclopoid copepod Cyclops scutifer in the more transparent lake, while no response to UV was observed in any of the zooplankton in the less transparent lake (Leech et al 2005a). In longerterm field experiments in 8-m-deep mesocosms that were either exposed to or shielded from UV, D. catawba showed a significant downward migration in response to UV, while the copepod L. minutus was more deeply distributed during day than at night but did not show a significant response to UV (Fischer et al 2006). Similarly, manipulation of UV in 3-m-deep field enclosures revealed no significant change in the daytime vertical distribution of the marine copepod Acartia hudsonica (Bollens and Frost 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As daphnids actively recognize the presence of harmful UVR through their compound eyes (Smith and Macagno, 1990), their first initial behavioral response is the flight into deeper waters ( Figure 2C; Leech and Williamson, 2001;Rhode et al, 2001;Fischer et al, 2006;Williamson et al, 2011). By doing so, they effectively eliminate potential metabolic harm from UVR (Häder and Sinha, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Life stages of a variety of species including pelagic fish and zooplankton can be found within this photic zone in the water column, and, thus have developed numerous strategies for ameliorating the effects of UVR exposure. These include the accumulation of protective pigments from dietary sources, rapid onset of melanin pigments, and behavioral strategies such as diurnal vertical migration [45]- [49].…”
Section: Synergistic Effects Of Natural and Anthropogenic Stressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%