2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17144970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Ultrafine Particles in Ambient Air on Primary Health Care Consultations for Diabetes in Children and Elderly Population in Ljubljana, Slovenia: A 5-Year Time-Trend Study

Abstract: Epidemiological studies indicate that exposure to ultrafine particles (UFP) in ambient air represents an important environmental public health issue. The aim of this study was to determine the association between UFP in ambient air and the daily number of consultations in the primary health care unit due to diabetes mellitus in children and elderly population of the Municipality of Ljubljana. A 5-year time-trend ecological study was carried out for the period between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also important to note that residual surface‐bound implant particulate is not continually released in vivo but, as a worst case, can be assumed to be a one‐time bolus dose. Further comparison of exposure level of residual implant particle criteria to everyday exposure (i.e., <1 × 10 7 particles for <1 μm sized residual particles) indicates that it is approximately equivalent to the amount of 0.1 μm sized particles inhaled in 10 average breaths of good quality outdoor air in rural conditions (i.e., 1.3 × 10 6 particles per breath: 0.1 μm particles: 2610 × 10 6 particles/m 3 in good quality rural air, at 500 mL per average breath) 36–38 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also important to note that residual surface‐bound implant particulate is not continually released in vivo but, as a worst case, can be assumed to be a one‐time bolus dose. Further comparison of exposure level of residual implant particle criteria to everyday exposure (i.e., <1 × 10 7 particles for <1 μm sized residual particles) indicates that it is approximately equivalent to the amount of 0.1 μm sized particles inhaled in 10 average breaths of good quality outdoor air in rural conditions (i.e., 1.3 × 10 6 particles per breath: 0.1 μm particles: 2610 × 10 6 particles/m 3 in good quality rural air, at 500 mL per average breath) 36–38 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that it is approximately equivalent to the amount of 0.1 μm sized particles inhaled in 10 average breaths of good quality outdoor air in rural conditions (i.e., 1.3 Â 10 6 particles per breath: 0.1 μm particles: 2610 Â 10 6 particles/m 3 in good quality rural air, at 500 mL per average breath) [36][37][38]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 UFPs can even enter the brain through the olfactory nerves 10,11 and cause brain damage, which is associated with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. 12,13 Exposure to UFPs might cause more severe health risks to the sensitive groups including older adults 14 and children. 15,16 Particle number concentration (PNC) is the most commonly used measure to characterize UFPs and to evaluate their exposure risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of new technologies requires additional health care workers and proper training. On the other hand, new health risks are emerging due to lifestyle changes, pollution, and epidemiological threats [8]. All of this is leading to continually increasing the number of health care workers and spending on health care, and poses serious concerns for the sustainability of health care systems in many countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%