1965
DOI: 10.2527/jas1965.241120x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Type and Breed of British, Zebu and Dairy Cattle on Production, Palatability and Composition. IV. Yield of Gastrointestinal Tract and Other Non-Carcass Components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heavier internal organs (liver and kidneys) in the dairy strains compared to the beef breeds has also been observed by others (Ramsey et al, 1965;Harte and Conniffe, 1967;More O'Ferrall and Keane, 1990), while the higher proportion of internal organs in HO compared to FR was reflected in a higher kill-out proportion (519 v 511 g/kg) for FR (Campion et al, 2009). This supports the conclusion of Kauffman et al (1976) that, associated with its poorer muscling characteristics, the size of the body cavity is greater in HO.…”
Section: Non Carcass Componentssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The heavier internal organs (liver and kidneys) in the dairy strains compared to the beef breeds has also been observed by others (Ramsey et al, 1965;Harte and Conniffe, 1967;More O'Ferrall and Keane, 1990), while the higher proportion of internal organs in HO compared to FR was reflected in a higher kill-out proportion (519 v 511 g/kg) for FR (Campion et al, 2009). This supports the conclusion of Kauffman et al (1976) that, associated with its poorer muscling characteristics, the size of the body cavity is greater in HO.…”
Section: Non Carcass Componentssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…When comparing crossbred with Zebu cattle, several studies have reported greater DMI and ADG for crossbred cattle (Rogerson et al, 1968;Fox et al, 1988;Euclides Filho et al, 2001). However, the increased dressing percentage in NE yearling bulls, when compared with TC yearling bulls, may be attributed to some characteristics of Zebu cattle such as lighter gastrointestinal tract weight and its contents, smaller head, and a lighter leather weight (Butler et al, 1956;Ramsey et al, 1965). On the other hand, in this study, NE yearling bulls had increased amount of kidney-pelvic fat expressed as % of HCW.…”
Section: Biotypescontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Hereford and the Angus bulls that were shown in the present study have been noted before (Damon et al 1960;Butler et al 1962;Cole et al 1963Cole et al , 1964Ramsey et al 1965) (Palsson 1955). By contrast, the value ofb for increase in length was near the theoretical value of 3.…”
Section: Many Of the Differences Between Thesupporting
confidence: 59%