2001
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of two types of brief intervention and readiness to change on alcohol use in hazardous drinkers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
1
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
96
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps because of this, many primary care providers may also lack sufficient interest or investment in brief intervention approaches (Beich, Gannik, & Malterud, 2002). Brief interventions seeking more than an initial opportunistic session must also contend with significant attrition (e.g., Maisto et al, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps because of this, many primary care providers may also lack sufficient interest or investment in brief intervention approaches (Beich, Gannik, & Malterud, 2002). Brief interventions seeking more than an initial opportunistic session must also contend with significant attrition (e.g., Maisto et al, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] For example, the content of brief counseling should refl ect whether the patient recognizes his drinking is a problem and whether he has contemplated or tried to change. [10][11][12] One study suggested that the effi cacy of brief alcohol counseling differed for patients with differing readiness to change. 11 Further, clinicians have reported concern that primary care patients who screen positive for alcohol misuse will deny that they misuse alcohol or will not be interested in discussing or changing their drinking when the issue is raised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] One study suggested that the effi cacy of brief alcohol counseling differed for patients with differing readiness to change. 11 Further, clinicians have reported concern that primary care patients who screen positive for alcohol misuse will deny that they misuse alcohol or will not be interested in discussing or changing their drinking when the issue is raised. [13][14][15][16] Denial of alcohol misuse is sometimes assumed to be a characteristic of alcohol dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, encontramos que puntuar alto en la subescala de mantenimiento se relaciona con la abstinencia, resultado que se encuentra en la misma dirección que el hallado en otro estudio anterior (Henderson, Saules y Galen, 2004). No obstante, aún no se conoce la influencia de la motivación al cambio sobre la eficacia de la entrevista motivacional y cómo mediatizaría el cambio de comportamiento (Berman et al, 2010;Dunn, Deroo y Rivara, 2001;Maisto et al, 2001;Vasilaki et al, 2006), siendo necesaria mayor investigación en este sentido. Diana Bachiller, Lara Grau-López, Carmen Barral, Constanza Daigre, Cristina Alberich, Laia Rodríguez-Cintas, Sergi Valero, Miquel Casas, Carlos Roncero Uno de los objetivos principales del grupo terapéutico fue motivar la retención postalta.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified